5000 Rambler wrote:
But, in response to the guy's rant about how dumb my comparison was, he has also run 7:43, which, though not as fast as Jager, is pretty damn fast, and faster than GF anyways.
Never disagreed that Hill was fast -- he's a great runner. But you did write "has faster college times than..." which was easily verified as untrue for multiple people on your list. Just saying, when you're trying to use data to back up your point it doesn't help your case when the data says something else entirely. No need to take offense -- you're clearly a Hill fan, and I think he's great. Fast, good range, and a solid interview. But don't inflate his accomplishments with false comparisons -- that's just sloppy.