Don´t miss my out of interest about the Central Governor with my interest in coach and training information.
One thing is my position as coach about the Central Govern theory. It´s one subject that no one did prove he existence, it´s just academic speculation and the usual astralized individuals be the rocket physiology new theories did agree emotional more than rational. if i did write about the 2 fiber types issue it´s not because i and Hadd we did discover something, new or old. It´s mainly because in my opinion that my theory of different training need from different fiber type and the need of training individualisation is a issue that gor some application in te concrete training by the coach lead. Or everything i did read what is the CG,the existance, it´s just an hypothesis and got no way to have a concrete training or science or biology or physiology or phychology or "nervous system" apllication to quote the other Detector idiot.
Because got no prove and no positive effect, the training context doesn´t really matters me for that reason. Got no consequence to the training methodology. As a coach and in the training context one subject it matters me just if got some a practical application try to learn.I know that the man got the moon in 1969 but what´s the link tot he training methodology ' I don´t know no one. That doesn´t mean that i don´t like to know what i can about the conquer of the moon.
Similar thing to the CG. The fact that i think he CG is one irrelevant subject to the distance training methodology doesn´t imply that i don´t understand what is or that i don´t got my information and my opinion about the subject.
I don´t got here where i did read what Noakes said about Lopes. But i remember what he says. He says that Lopes training was basically intervals and daily easy runs, and that kind of training to him is the prove that LT doesn´t work, due to Lopes run success without LT runs on his training schedule. Or it´s just not true,
because Carlos Lopes did the daily continuous runs very faster. he question this. How can someone built a theory with wrong facts, wrong information, wrong training. He quotes where he took Lopes training, and the source was a published book, but in fact what he says it´s wrong.
I remember that when Noakes did post on this LetsRunCom board he wrote that the he doesn´t trust on the positive effect on Lydiard training as the Lydiardism does, and that´s one reason why he did search about one rationale reason to suport whatmakes one runner be fast relate to other. But ironic is that Gipsy (Shipsy) says that the Central Governor agrees with Lydiard training.
I can try the where i read Nokes quote about Lopes training.
Rekrunner. What you say about the Central Governor is not new to me. But you, like you all, and Noakes couldn´t say just one single application of the Central Governor to the training methodology. It´s something like to know that the
extraterrestials beings do exist, but we can get close contact to them. It´s useless knowledge.
Rekrunner. Everything is premature until not proved. I prefer to debate to old training dogmas, the old training paradigms that are not quite right, and that ones we don´t need to wait for a future application. Got not speculation on that because if it´s done, that´s a fact.
People from science speculation they love new theories, that aren´t take for grant. I prefer things with prove.
I don´t see why he CG can bring a better understand of training. the CG can only bring speculation because it´s not quantified. We would be on the wrong track if instead of going in the training objective direction, time and space and distance that´s objective reality, we fall in an attempt to undersand why ne runner is fast than other by the Central Governor. If so, we will be distant, more distant to the training issues that matters.