Who is faster over 300m, Rupp or Solinsky? Proof?

break it up wrote:

ddffv wrote:

Really? No one thinks they can bust out at least a 49 second 400m?

Out of the blocks, no. I doubt either could break 50.0. That is seriously fast running for 10k guys running 100 plus mile weeks.

I would be surprised if any 5-10 runner in history has done it, unless it was early in their career and their primary event at the time was 800-1500.

Maybe Geb and Bekele.

What's the slowest 5k/10k time that you would consider someone to be a 5-10 runner?

There are many stupid posts in this thread so I am not going to respond to anyone specifically, just sum up a few thoughts after reading through the posts in the thread thus far.

Rupp would beat Solinsky at 300m.

There is no way Rupp has 48 second 400 speed. Daniel Komen was a 3:29 1500m runner and there was no chance in hell of him breaking 50. Ever.

Rupp has 50.xx 400m speed at best.

Rupp has better speed than Solinsky.

There are plenty of 5k/10k guys with sub 50 speed. Not many have run sub 27 though.

Rupp closes in 52-53 in 5k and 10k races and no one believes he can break 50... How exactly does one make that coclusion.

Also I would contend that Rupp might have more 400 speed than Komen. Komen is like a German Fernandez. A super-efficient runner, but I've never seen him kick the way Rupp does.

I think you are greatly underestimating the speed of Fernandez and Komen. Komen had better top end speed than Haile.

Gonna have to call BS wrote:

47.xx? Do you have any proof of this? With that kind of speed and Rupp's strength he should be able to run a 1:44 800. His 800 pr appears to be 1:50 (1:49.87).

Sorry but I'm gonna have to call BS.

A 46 high relay split is equivalent to a low-mid 47.xx open 400m.

Komen could roll out of bed today in whatever fitness he's in and break 50. I would bed money he or any 3:29 runner could break 50 in his prime.

easy answer wrote:

Gonna have to call BS wrote:

47.xx? Do you have any proof of this? With that kind of speed and Rupp's strength he should be able to run a 1:44 800. His 800 pr appears to be 1:50 (1:49.87).

Sorry but I'm gonna have to call BS.

A 46 high relay split is equivalent to a low-mid 47.xx open 400m.

When did Rupp run a 46?

rupp has a faster 1500m PR than solinsky (why is solinsky still relevant?). rupps 10k time way better than his 5k time because he hasn't ran a time trial 5k. saladbar even said rupp can run the 100m in under 11 while starting from a standing position. i'd go with rupp

World Class Hobby Jogger wrote:

.... saladbar even said rupp can run the 100m in under 11 while starting from a standing position. i'd go with rupp

If you believe that Rupp can go sub-11 in the 100m from a standing start you are retarded, mentally ill, or on hallucinogenic drugs. Possibly all three.

This should not be a thread.

Solinsky has never displayed an ounce of speed.

I'd say Fernandez may be as fast as Solinsky.

Rupp beats Solinsky at every distance, 10m to ultra marathon.

The rocket. wrote:

Rupp closes in 52-53 in 5k and 10k races and no one believes he can break 50... How exactly does one make that coclusion.

Also I would contend that Rupp might have more 400 speed than Komen. Komen is like a German Fernandez. A super-efficient runner, but I've never seen him kick the way Rupp does.

Yes, he couldn't break 50

He closes SLOW 5k & 10k races in 53 seconds.

Bekele did the same, and there is no chance in hell of him breaking 50 seconds.

People can't comprehend the fact that endurance monsters can run within 2 seconds of their best 400 at the end of a slow race.

crazy raisin wrote:

Komen could roll out of bed today in whatever fitness he's in and break 50.

Nope

Just ask Bob Kennedy about that.

I would bed money he or any 3:29 runner could break 50 in his prime.

How many 3:29 guys have 12:39 endurance?

Hint: The answer is less than 2.

If there was proof then we wouldn't have to ask the question?

:)

Ok, this is ridiculous. Rupp is faster than Solinsky... Why are people still on Solinsky's train, he's garbage. Rupp drops 52-54 at the end of his 10k RACES, clearly he can run sub 50. How many sub 3:35 guys can't run sub 50?? Is it even possible to go sub 3:35 if you can't break 50? Also, saying Daniel Komen can't break 50 is just laughable, 3:29 and you think he can't break a 50 in an open fresh 400m race. And to the guy making the argument that bigger guys are faster is absolutely retarded... Trindon Holiday was 5'5" and was the 100m NCAA champ. It's genetics... I know so many small 135 pound distance runners that are lightning quick.

Jack Mehoff wrote:

Ok, this is ridiculous. Rupp is faster than Solinsky... Why are people still on Solinsky's train, he's garbage. Rupp drops 52-54 at the end of his 10k RACES, clearly he can run sub 50. How many sub 3:35 guys can't run sub 50?? Is it even possible to go sub 3:35 if you can't break 50? Also, saying Daniel Komen can't break 50 is just laughable, 3:29 and you think he can't break a 50 in an open fresh 400m race. And to the guy making the argument that bigger guys are faster is absolutely retarded... Trindon Holiday was 5'5" and was the 100m NCAA champ. It's genetics... I know so many small 135 pound distance runners that are lightning quick.

I was taking you somewhat seriously until you claimed genetics

Jack Mehoff wrote:

Ok, this is ridiculous. Rupp is faster than Solinsky... Why are people still on Solinsky's train, he's garbage. Rupp drops 52-54 at the end of his 10k RACES, clearly he can run sub 50. How many sub 3:35 guys can't run sub 50?? Is it even possible to go sub 3:35 if you can't break 50? Also, saying Daniel Komen can't break 50 is just laughable, 3:29 and you think he can't break a 50 in an open fresh 400m race. And to the guy making the argument that bigger guys are faster is absolutely retarded... Trindon Holiday was 5'5" and was the 100m NCAA champ. It's genetics... I know so many small 135 pound distance runners that are lightning quick.

what part of your tiny pea brain can't comprehend the fact that komen had 12:39 endurance?

Geb didn't have sub 50 speed.

Bekele didn't have sub 50 speed.

Komen didn't have sub 50 speed.

Rupp doesn't have sub 50 speed.

Just because you can close a slow 10k in 53 seconds DOES NOT mean you have sub 50 speed.

Understand?

THIS is ridiculous.

Which distance runners have sub-50 speed? Maybe check out this thread:

Scroll down, check out Malmo's post.

while it may be true that there are few true 10k/5k runners that can break 50, I'm sure a lot of the top 5k/3k/1500m runners could break 50, and certainly going down in distance from there, an even more significant portion.

we can't act like it is very rare for hs middle distance runners (=college/pro distance runners, as they all move up) to run sub 50. my lousy hs had two 800/mile runners with sub 50 open pr's. (their 800/mile pr's were 1:54.8/4:18 and maybe 1:57).

someone had to do it wrote:

what part of your tiny pea brain can't comprehend the fact that komen had 12:39 endurance?

Geb didn't have sub 50 speed.

Bekele didn't have sub 50 speed.

Komen didn't have sub 50 speed.

Rupp doesn't have sub 50 speed.

Just because you can close a slow 10k in 53 seconds DOES NOT mean you have sub 50 speed.

Understand?

Why are you being so condescending? You have no idea if those guys have sub50 speed or not. The issue is entirely debatable. Haven't Geb or Bekele closed races with the last 200m in like 24 seconds? If so, then that clearly points to the possibility of sub 50 capability. Relax.