I'm arguing with an idiot. You keep spinning around and around with these rebuttals that absolutely bring nothing to the central argument itself. I really don't know why you state some of the things you say when it doesn't matter to my argument and does nothing to give yours the advantage.
It's annoying. You know you've got nothing left to say but you keep blabbing anyway. The only thing keeping you from looking like a fool is the majority of distance fans rooting for Rudisha along with you.
You have YET to explain to me the central theme of this ENTIRE thread.... why is it significant? I've reiterated my facts about why it's significant so many times and you have given me nothing. Which is why it's annoying. You keep dodging the question and arguing around it.
Rudisha is impressive. More so than Blake. But no... not more so SIGNIFICANT. Look up the definition and maybe you can stop dodging the question and making meaningless mini arguments from my posts.
I don't quote people phrase for phrase. That's retarded and it can easily make you look like the smarter man. You must read the entire post as a whole and realize that each phrase builds on each other to form a whole complete train of thought. You have jagged, haphazard trains of thought that jump from place to place. There is nothing rational or complete about them. It's like you're doing a Q&A instead of forming a proper response.
You blatantly spew BS out when you know otherwise. Such as your opening phrase that Bolt's height is disproven. Where? It's been proven. For god's sake he takes 41 strides as opposed to 43. He has more speed endurance. His block start is not atrocious like Carl's (probably because of PED's) so it is now a distinct advantage. 5'10 guys cannot cover this same ground like Bolt.
And what is this work you speak of? "Sitting behind someone and letting them do all the work" As if just because you're behind someone you magically use less energy. Seems to me like a mental problem for 800m runners. I can understand staying in last and kicking because the pace is too quick. That is not being rabbited nor drafting. That is called tactics.
As for your physiological advantage retort, I guess you don't know what outliers are. And especially since Rudisha is the first "in forever" to do this.
"And if you don't think so [that rabbits are a physiological advantage], why do you suppose Rudisha's run was the first non-rabbited wr in such an event in forever?" -wtfunny
So how then did he run a PR and WR without a rabbit? Not only did that mini-reply make no sense in context but it further solidifies my stance that you have no idea what you're talking about.
Also, you argue that something happening in the Olympics makes it MORE significant and then rant about how you're correct. When in reality i clearly said, "it does not make it MOST significant." Big difference.
Let's not forget the last paragraph of your reply. "Really? And just who has Blake's run proven to work for other than Blake?" -wtfunny
Once again making absolutely no sense. Blake proved that you can be under 6foot and run 9.6 (9.5 with a strong tailwind). Rudisha's run has been unproven to work for anyone but him (running in front without a rabbit). How can you not understand this?
You are arguing against a phantom. A ghost. Certainly not me. You seem to be clueless as to what you're arguing for or even about. Your statements take my posts out of context in most everything you type. You desperately try to claim I'm ridiculous without explaining anything, merely hoping that quoting me justifies this stance. And don't forget your Q&A style of posting. As if each individual phrase I type stands naked and alone instead of intact for a complete train of thought.
There are so many flaws in your ability to decipher and formulate a proper response that it is painstaking to reply to your posts. It has consumed a great deal of my time even formulating the words to explain what you're doing wrong and why you make no sense.
I hope you never reply again in this thread at me, because undoubtedly we'll once again see these inconsistencies and flaws. Just let it go.