Uncivil Engineer wrote:
[quote]Mr.Spock wrote:
You've decided he's guilty because he's not fighting anymore. That's not a criterion for guilt.
I just told you, it's far more than that. You just blithely ignore the biochemical shenanigans reported by USADA as well as the damning testimony of countless Armstrong peers, because you prefer that Armstrong be clean.
Mr.Spock wrote:
WHEN the evidence becomes public knowledge...
It already is. Read the thread by Breaking Bad Company (USADA statement on Armstrong). Seriously, just ten minutes of reading in lieu of posting ignorant bullshit on the board should be enough to divest you of your wrongheaded notions.
I read it. It's not evidence - it's a STATEMENT that we have evidence. I don't particularly like Lance or cycling. I think he's probably cheated. But that's not enough, and reading what the USADA says they have in some press release is also not enough. I think you (and gonchar and tor) are just getting a kick out of seeing him eviscerated. Like a mob at a Colosseum lion vs man cage fight. There are other statements on this thread equally troubling, like this one from Sprintgeezer:
"Just like it is not possible to repeatedly run 9.5, 9.6, and 9.7 basic times in the 100m without juicing, it is not possible to win 7 TdF's without juicing, whether or not positive results are returned."
This is madness. It's the same standard of evidence used to prove that aliens abduct people, that angels really exist, that man didn't really come from monkeys. I KNOW it, so I don't need any evidence.