sloppy lawyers wrote:
I want to see him retested. Not by the fools at USADA but by a truly independent lab. Whether he is found guilty or not is not as important as cleaning house at the USADA is.
I completely support drug testing and clean competition, but I do not support the lawyers running the USADA.
You guys tried that one once before, remember? Do you really think that you can slither out of this mess with the same old smoke and mirrors?
_____________________________________________________________
Philosophy Behind 2009 Lance Armstrong Monitoring Program:
I was approached to help develop a monitoring program for Lance Armstrong’s comeback in 2009. As initially conceived, it would have been the first time that any testing organization would be allowed to sample and test Armstrong every three days or even more often and make the analytical data available online for anyone interested to see. My laboratory would have had unrestricted ability to perform any test we wanted. Under those circumstances, I did not believe that anybody could get away with cheating. I was interested to proceed.
Clarification on the intended Armstrong monitoring program:
We were aiming to collect from Armstrong on average every three days throughout the cycling season. Such a program would be very challenging logistically and would be quite expensive. It would also likely impact the activities of the international doping control process. We did not want to impede or interfere with the sanctioning bodies’ ability to test Armstrong, which we knew they would do frequently.
As negotiations were wrapping up, we did perform one collection prior to abandoning the program. The logistical and cost realities became immediately apparent. In addition, there were difficulties with the publicity surrounding the program.
The article says that “In its months of overseeing Armstrong’s testing program, Catlin’s lab had collected only one urine sample from him, … and it is clean.”
It is correct that only one sample was collected, however we had only overseen the program for one day, not months. The results were free of any blood profile abnormalities, the urine was negative for EPO analogues and had a T/E ratio below 4.
_____________________________________________________________
So get with the program and get on the line to Austin for some fresh talking points too. You desperately need to discredit the plasticine blood bag test now.