$1000 says that at least one LSU football player has enjoyed consensual coitus with Ms. Jones.
$1000 says that at least one LSU football player has enjoyed consensual coitus with Ms. Jones.
Christian fella wrote:
Its interesting that you post as Quenton Cassidy, because it may hekp illustrate a point that you don’t understand One reason Once a Runner is such a popular book, and one reason why Quenton Cassidy is such a great character is because all track runners can see a little bit of themselves in Quenton or maybe Bruce; that unwavering dedication to the cause, the very lack of compromise is something track and field athletes have in common. That's what virginity until marriage is all about for people who regard sex as a religious experience; unwavering dedication, no compromise.
Christians who stick to those ideals, like all other people, want to have sex. They desire it as much as anyone else. Striving to remain pure until marriage, and dedicating your life to you spouse is no different from an athlete breaking four minutes in the mile without the use of performance enhancing drugs. You could cheat, you could do it the wrong way, but their is so much less satisfaction that way, along with all of the inherent risks. The dedication to work, hard brutal work, to make yourself better, is the same between the athlete and the abstinent.
If you are "pure" by abstaining from sex until marriage, what are these people called once they get married and have sex? Impure? Dirty? Filthy? Sinners?
Why do you consider someone who has not had sex to be not "contaminated" by it? If they have it once they are married are they now forever ruined?
Whenever people make long arguments about why they're not having sex right now, I assume the real reason is that none's available. You "don't see the point", so I'm guessing you're not in a relationship. I also consider it a bad sign when someone's stayed a virgin for a really long time for no reason, since it means they probably don't like sex very much.
By the way, birth control is extremely effective if you're not a moron. If you're still worried, birth control + withdrawal is essentially 100% effective. You should be more worried about getting in a car than about getting pregnant by accident.
Azaleas wrote:
Whenever people make long arguments about why they're not having sex right now, I assume the real reason is that none's available. You "don't see the point", so I'm guessing you're not in a relationship. I also consider it a bad sign when someone's stayed a virgin for a really long time for no reason, since it means they probably don't like sex very much.
By the way, birth control is extremely effective if you're not a moron. If you're still worried, birth control + withdrawal is essentially 100% effective. You should be more worried about getting in a car than about getting pregnant by accident.
Exactly. Reproduction is not "the" point of sex, it's only a reason for having sex. Loving affection and pleasure are other reasons, as I can assure you that the vast majority of people in healthy relationships (including moral married couples) have sex other than just when trying to have kids. As a species we evolved to enjoy sex. Abstinence fantasizers live in denial of that quirk of evolution, though they may live in denial of evolution itself.
newname wrote:
Why do you consider someone who has not had sex to be not "contaminated" by it? If they have it once they are married are they now forever ruined?
Are you being intentionally ignorant? Obviously it's irrelevant once they're married. I don't know why limiting your number of sexual partners is considered a bad thing. It's not something I would ever fault someone for.
I also don't know why people refuse to admit that abstinence is the only 100% effective way to prevent STDs and pregnancy. I agree that there should be discussions about other forms of contraceptives, but to treat abstinence as a taboo is insane.
Some of you people here are advocating celibacy, good luck with that, it will be the end of the goddamn human race.
Word on the street is that Nick Symmonds indeed had a month long fling with Jones. There was indeed some vicious pounding there.
Part of Obama's healthcare reform law involves abstinence only ed & programs must teach that sex before marriage likely causes psychological & physical effects.
"programs that receive this funding must teach that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid out-of-wedlock pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and other associated health problems." And they also have to teach that sex before marriage is "likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/26/health/health-reform-fun-facts/index.html?hpt=he_c2&hpt=hp_c2
I don't get why everyone thinks she's super good looking. I see her as a 5-6 on the standard 10 point scale.
Yeah the government also teaches lots of other stuff that isn't true. What's new?
Also plenty of people are off their rockers because they are sexually repressed. Silly.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot wrote:
Azaleas wrote:Whenever people make long arguments about why they're not having sex right now, I assume the real reason is that none's available. You "don't see the point", so I'm guessing you're not in a relationship. I also consider it a bad sign when someone's stayed a virgin for a really long time for no reason, since it means they probably don't like sex very much.
By the way, birth control is extremely effective if you're not a moron. If you're still worried, birth control + withdrawal is essentially 100% effective. You should be more worried about getting in a car than about getting pregnant by accident.
Exactly. Reproduction is not "the" point of sex, it's only a reason for having sex. Loving affection and pleasure are other reasons, as I can assure you that the vast majority of people in healthy relationships (including moral married couples) have sex other than just when trying to have kids. As a species we evolved to enjoy sex. Abstinence fantasizers live in denial of that quirk of evolution, though they may live in denial of evolution itself.
Wrong. Reproduction IS 'the' purpose for sex. The fact that you feel pleasure from it is a built in mechanism to ensure that the act is performed in order to propagate. If it didn't feel good, how effective do you think this method of reproduction would be?
It's like eating. You have to eat to survive. That is the point of eating. The fact that you enjoy it ensures that you eat adequately. And the fact that it staves of that feeling of hunger is another reason. You feel hunger so that you will eat.
You feel pleasure during sex so that you will continue to have sex.
A method of reproduction exists solely to reproduce.
Whatever feelings or whatever comes from it is simply to ensure that the act gets performed.
When did letsrun.com turn into People magazine?
get this guys wrote:
Wrong. Reproduction IS 'the' purpose for sex. The fact that you feel pleasure from it is a built in mechanism to ensure that the act is performed in order to propagate. If it didn't feel good, how effective do you think this method of reproduction would be?
It's like eating. You have to eat to survive. That is the point of eating. The fact that you enjoy it ensures that you eat adequately. And the fact that it staves of that feeling of hunger is another reason. You feel hunger so that you will eat.
You feel pleasure during sex so that you will continue to have sex.
A method of reproduction exists solely to reproduce.
Whatever feelings or whatever comes from it is simply to ensure that the act gets performed.
Great post.
But logical reasoning doesn't always go over well on letsrun, so expect some backfire.
Weird and creepy from start to finish.
Why the obsession with sex and virginity? If I were a professional athlete and somebody stuck a microphone in my face, the last thing I would think to talk about is sex. It's weird.
And if I was dating a 29yo girl who told me she was a virgin, I would assume she has serious issues that I don't want to deal with. Jesus-issues, daddy-issues, uncle-in-the-closet-issues... Or she is a just a repressed lesbian. Check, please!
It's her life, her choice, her beliefs. Why do you folks, especially the anti-religion crowd, have to ridicule? You claim to be so "open-minded" about people's life choices and sexual orientation. You libtards only agree if someone is just like you, yet can't fathom that another system of beliefs is worthy of your respect.
Im 58 and a virgin.
You guys are shitty.
I don't believe in magic, had sex in high school and every year since, and generally think religious people are silly.
That said, how could anyone say anything bad about Lolo?! She's incredibly friendly, nice and cool. If you rip on Lolo, you are a shitty person. Wow.
We are not ridiculing her for choosing to stay a virgin, in fact, we one hundred percent agree that a women should retain autonomy over her own body (see: birth control and abortion). What most of us are saying here, is that choosing to remain a virgin until you are a married is bizarre. While it is her choice and I do respect someone for being able to control their instincts that well, in this situation it makes no sense. If you want to have sex, wear a condom; do it. If you feel comfortable with the person, you'll have a good time. That's all it has to be. The large majority of us do it quite a bit and don't have any problems with it. So for someone to deny themselves sex when there is really no rational reason not to if you are safe about it, it is kind of weird. "A present for her husband," really? How is that going to be a present for him? You won't have any idea what you're doing, it'll hurt, and there will be blood everywhere. The only thing I see coming out of that is some ruined sheets.
Christian fella wrote:
Striving to remain pure until marriage, and dedicating your life to you spouse is no different from an athlete breaking four minutes in the mile without the use of performance enhancing drugs. You could cheat, you could do it the wrong way, but their is so much less satisfaction that way, along with all of the inherent risks.
WTF are you even talking about?
You equate aiming to run a four minute mile with, um, aiming to one day have a sexual relationship with a spouse? And you equate taking PEDs with having other sex along the way to getting married?
Your twisted metaphor just shows that you are trying hard to justify your decisions, even to yourself.
get this guys wrote:
Wrong. Reproduction IS 'the' purpose for sex. The fact that you feel pleasure from it is a built in mechanism to ensure that the act is performed in order to propagate. If it didn't feel good, how effective do you think this method of reproduction would be?
A quick glance around the animal kingdom would show that it's actually pretty darn effective.