Your messages are so long that I wonder you are trying to make a point or just pasting long messages.
Did you say anything important that was not said before? And if so, where is it different than what you pasted that HAD been said before? How is it possible to differentiate, since you pasted so much. Really did you add anything?
If so, I must have missed it.
However if I was to guess your point, it would be that Kennedy has endurance, because he didn't run faster than 27:38?
Heck there are lots of 10000 meters on the track every year in the U.S. that Kennedy could have run. Why didn't he?
There have been 10000 meter races in Europe every year. Why didn't he run those?
BECAUSE HE KNEW HE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN HIS BUTT KICKED.
You're trying to tell me Kennedy had more endurance, apparently because he never ran over 90 miles in a week but since he's American it doesn't matter that Bekele WHO IS THREE TIMES DOUBLE WORLD XC CHAMPION runs 150 miles in a week!
Come on now, don't try to pull a fish over my eyes by telling me Kennedy has more endurance than Bekele.
Let's have a serious discussion here.