Assuming that agents can think past the usual nike, Reebok, adidas, etc. sponsorships and get companies like Ford, Apple, McDonalds, etc. to sponsor athletes, are there any that should be off limits or bad for the sport?
Assuming that agents can think past the usual nike, Reebok, adidas, etc. sponsorships and get companies like Ford, Apple, McDonalds, etc. to sponsor athletes, are there any that should be off limits or bad for the sport?
The NFL?
Pfizer, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline.
BALCO
Though Viagara sponsored a car in NASCAR, it would not look so good with the little short shorts or tight body suits.
Precious Roy wrote:
Pfizer, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline.
Come on, guys. This is soft pitch. The answer is clearly:
ExtenZe
Why? Is it only the chest that counts?
Lenny Leonard wrote:
Come on, guys. This is soft pitch. The answer is clearly:
ExtenZe
Weight Watchers
Nip Guards
Procrit
Not the cartoon dog wrote:
BALCO
The dog is Balto, not Balco.
"Depends"
Hooters.
Precious Roy wrote:
Pfizer, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline.
Yeah, it'd be awful of the athletes were endorsing companies whose products save lives.
Letsrun.com
FTW
Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds.
KY jelly
Grandma's Molasses
Starbucks or any other company that wants to destroy the sanctity of marriage.
Beef.
nike
Monsanto, Enron