I am not from the US but overseas (Europe). So pardon my English. I have some insight in the pharmacy bizz.
This is how it works here regarding prescribed drugs:
Pharmacists double check the doctors medication for the specific cause (with the help of a computer/online) and will in addition ask the customer if he/she takes other drugs, if the customer has any condition that will effect the medication (that the doctor is aware/unaware of) and if there is something specific to beware of the pharmacist informs about this.
Most times there is no problem, the customer knows how to take the drug and so on, but from time to time there are cases where its very crucial that the pharmacist intervenes and takes action. There are also rules to follow regarding the health system that must be followed.
Pharm techs (if it is the same as in my country) in general dont have the same depth of knowledge to see and intervene when there is something wrong with the medication. I believe that the pharmacy education on one hand is just to secure the quality of the staff in the pharmacy. To process a lot of pharm info and quickly obtain the core essence requires some training. A lot of this is developed through working in a pharmacy but the base of how to "think" is learned at uni.
I dont know, just trying to give my perspective. In my country a pharmacist, straight out of school, makes around 43 000 US dollars a year.
On the other hand, uni is free. But taxes are VERY high (30-50%). So its different systems. In US one makes a lot but have to pay for everything, more or less. Here you earn a lot less but school, health care etc is free or almost so.
Anyways, the bottom line is, there goes so much more into the job and responsibilty of a pharmacist which might not always be obvious for the customers eye....
Thanx for taking time to read, you die hard runners who stayed with me this far...:)