Do you have trouble with the concept that a banked track is faster than an unbanked track? And that maybe, just maybe an unbanked 307m track is roughly equivalent to a banked 200m? (actually slower from 600m down if you follow the stats).
M.C. you're an idiot wrote:
Having a hard time reading thoroughly?
"(Banked OR Over 200m/220 yds)* 13:44.60"
--- Therefor, a 200m banked track uses the same qualifying standard as a 300m track.
-Cam is a fast runner - there's no denying that - and I hope he runs well at NCAAs, but like a previous poster said, like in D3, it makes sense to have different qualifying standards for these huge tracks. Why doesn't that make perfect sense?
He hit the auto, but by only 2 seconds - he ran 8.3 LESS laps than he would have had to on a 200m track - surely that makes a difference. 8 laps is certainly significant.
-Just trying to point out the problems w/ not having a different qualifying time for 200m vs. 300m track - hope all the best to Cam himself.