Top-10 Coaching Jobs in Women's NCAA Division I in 2011

Drenth really ought to be ranked higher here. People tend to take it for granted, but he wins with decidedly less talent than Maguire at Michigan. Mike certainly does a nice job, but Drenth doesn't have anyone with anywhere near the high school credentials of Danielle Tauro or Jillian Smith. Michigan ran well at regionals (and would have won either way), but MSU was without arguably their #1. On Monday, I'd guess that whoever comes out ahead between the two will find themselves in the top 10.

while Keith did a great job developing Vanderbilt's women, he neglected the men. Merely, an outside observer, but from what it looks like to me, he shirks his responsibilities and for that reason I don't think he's worthy of this title. If he were a women's only coach it would be a different story, but he's not.

Men have no funding at all at Vanderbilt, it is not a normal DI program.

dcsxcxcx wrote:

while Keith did a great job developing Vanderbilt's women, he neglected the men. Merely, an outside observer, but from what it looks like to me, he shirks his responsibilities and for that reason I don't think he's worthy of this title. If he were a women's only coach it would be a different story, but he's not.

dcsxcxcx wrote:

while Keith did a great job developing Vanderbilt's women, he neglected the men. Merely, an outside observer, but from what it looks like to me, he shirks his responsibilities and for that reason I don't think he's worthy of this title. If he were a women's only coach it would be a different story, but he's not.

youre an idiot

dcsxcxcx wrote:

while Keith did a great job developing Vanderbilt's women, he neglected the men. Merely, an outside observer, but from what it looks like to me, he shirks his responsibilities and for that reason I don't think he's worthy of this title. If he were a women's only coach it would be a different story, but he's not.

You make an interesting point. With the schools that have two teams(men and women) going to NCAA's, do any of them have the same coach? or are there two different coaches?

What???? wrote:

Men have no funding at all at Vanderbilt, it is not a normal DI program.

dcsxcxcx wrote:

while Keith did a great job developing Vanderbilt's women, he neglected the men. Merely, an outside observer, but from what it looks like to me, he shirks his responsibilities and for that reason I don't think he's worthy of this title. If he were a women's only coach it would be a different story, but he's not.

Again.

Vanderbilt finishes sixth, one point behind Oregon despite Hasay getting second (in a great woman's race with a great finish).

This one puts a smile on my face. Congratulations to Keith and his crew (Rhonda, and the others).

MILTENBERG

Milt has done a great job for sure. This is his 5th year , not 4th, at Georgetown though.

Might want to add Miltenberg to that list now.

Got number one ranking preseason and despite mediocre performances kept his team's head in the game and got them read on the day that counted.

Randy Thomas just led Boston College to a 12th place finish. Incredible pack time i think it was under 40 seconds. They started off slow training hard then came on at the end of the year and peaked at the right time. You have to give him credit. I think they barely started out ranked then fell out of the rankings he needs to be in the top 10

Great job by Toledo to finish 21st. With a healthy Fisher, they are a potential Top-15 program with no foreigners and no high school all-americans! Very impressive. In that region, he is the one doing the most with the least. He outcoached MacGuire and Drenth and certainly outcoached Stintzi and the Notre Dame guy.

If Hadsell is still coaching at Toledo a year from now I would be shocked.

After the NCAA I would say:

Miltenberg

Metcalf

Proccachio

Vinny

Randy Thomas

BAS

Hadsell

Stintzi

Leeman-Winters

Herbster (darkhorse)