ttc wrote:
I never said there wasn't wind aid in Boston, so quit lying. There was huge wind aid there. You guys don't even know how to make a point. On a fast course, a 2:08 is well below Hall's standards, after years of consistently amazing marathons.
This is both incoherent (Hall's Boston time was grossly aided; Hall's Boston run set a new time standard for him) and factually incomplete (you mention Chicago's course, but not the weather or the way the race unfolded; you leave out Hall's various less-remarkable efforts). Mix in an obvious lie or two and you have your average Letsrun trollfecta.