Withheld wrote:
J.R. wrote:That is very nice of you. Thank you very much for saying this.
It could have been a nice post had you not treated it like a competition with Frank. Your family experience was different than what Frank went through though you both had horrible fathers. But, to blame him or to 'have no use for him' is ridiculous and a sad reflection on you.
It is good that you survived your situation and actually grew into a better man than your father. As a father of two, I truly cannot understand how a parent can do this to their own children.
This is intense stuff to share /write. I think the poster can be given a wide path of understanding if he did not write it perfectly (for you.)
I did not see it as a competition.
Sharing child abuse is not a competition -- I've spent thousands of hours studying family psychology. When an individual finally, or occasionally lets this stuff out, it can trigger - or re-trigger - lots of emotions.
One could pick nits with the RW writer, and even with some of Franks frames and quotes...if you wanted to get clinical... Somehow, I don't think that is the point.
There is a meta-message that is far more important than picking nits... ALL child abuse is BAD (BAD, BAD, BAD, you know, harmful to little evolving human spirits and personalities).
It's not a contest. Abuse that could be judged as "less" than "abuse" another little human experienced...might have worse outcomes in life for the receiver of the abuse. There are so many variables, that the variables aren't really important.
What is important is that the victims be heard, and get the best treatment available -- and when these stories come out -- "we" as a society stop blaming, or shaming the messenger.
Treat your children well.