YES!
SEMENYA LOST
Report Thread
-
-
She tanked it in the last 30 meters to let the Russian win and keep the attention off of her a bit.
-
Looks like she did it on purpose
-
that is no comfort given that the winner is a tainted Russian!! Dopers go 1-2!!!
-
The person who beat her didn't look too feminine herself.
-
John Beck wrote:
She tanked it in the last 30 meters to let the Russian win and keep the attention off of her a bit.
Yea, I agree, but what I don't understand is why she pushed it so hard after 400m -
fff>> do you think everyone else is clean?
-
not necessarily. It is more likely the Kenyans are clean than
the Russians given their long history of doping offenses. -
girliegirl wrote:
The person who beat her didn't look too feminine herself.
Are you joking? She looked absolutely normal for a female runner. -
No visible strain on Semenya at all. She has looked so good in other races it really does appear she's capable of 1:52 or 1:53.
-
Amazing that she's eligible to run in the women's field.
-
I'd rather see a doper win than a man...
-
T-man wrote:
No visible strain on Semenya at all. She has looked so good in other races it really does appear she's capable of 1:52 or 1:53.
There was a bit of visible strain when that Russian flew past her. Interesting how Caster suddenly runs 2 seconds faster than she's done all year though
Savinova ran a brilliant tactical race tracking Caster through the whole race and just striking at the right time
Had her down to win after seeing her outsprint Meadows indoors -
Come on, please stop this BS of an athlete losing on purpose - no athlete will ever do that. And she doesn't have to care what anybody thought if she won: She is eligible by the IAAF, whatever we might feel about that...That is what counts for her.
And Savinova 1:55,87 - I don't know if the Russians are clean, there are serious question marks, but I some like to see her win like that. -
And Savinova has been running 1:55s all year?
-
- I have 3 girls
- They no nothing of Caster
- All 3 commented separately that "She looks like a boy!" while we watched the webcast.
- My girls no little of IAAF track & field
- Case closed -
Who is Kenisha Sinclair? The best part of the WC ending is I won't have to listen to Larry Rawson's British twin, Steve Ovett. He obviously can't even read!
-
Lickety Split wrote:
- I have 3 girls
- They no nothing of Caster
- All 3 commented separately that "She looks like a boy!" while we watched the webcast.
- My girls no little of IAAF track & field
- Case closed
I hope your girls learn to spell better than you do. -
52.43 >> just because she's eligible, that doesn't mean it's right. She clearly has an advantage simply because she's not a 100% female.
-
Nina wrote:
52.43 >> just because she's eligible, that doesn't mean it's right. She clearly has an advantage simply because she's not a 100% female.
You'd better have a damn good definition of "100% female." Let's hear it.