I know, not another ubiquitous Pre post, but I wonder how many would agree with me. I don't think Pre would have won gold in the 5K against Lasse Viren in 76. Viren's double double in the 5 and 10 is amazing. I know about the accusations of blood doping and drugs but let's speak to the issue. Viren was obviously great at periodization. I'm not saying Pre wouldn't have gotten stronger but Viren had his number. I think Pre possibly could have won the 10K but he wouldn't have doubled in 76 so maybe in 80 he could have taken gold in the 10. Pre hated this thought--that he'd have to move up to the 10K, but his 10K time with only a few races is phenomenal. Frank Shorter never even had a faster 10K at that distance. Any thoughts?