socalcush wrote:
i would imagine training hard is a relative term.
cush
I think it is relative to the type of injuries folks have had. Soft tissue, mild tendon, and anything folks can get over with a few months off or even 6 months with intervention tend to be indefinitely sustainable. So how hard one trains is not the primary focus.
But based on what I have gleaned from two orthopedic docs I know, one a surgeon; any injury that requires surgical intervention is a red flag for longevity as that area becomes a permanent potential point of problems for the future. I personally know excellent runners younger than myself who have had various screws, plates, and transplants of other parts of their bodies put in their feet and knees. I’ve seen them fall by the wayside over the years.
I know folks just LOVE to point to people who’ve had both knees replaced and keep on running. This is the kind of inductive reasoning that people use to justify smoking cigarettes because, after all, Jeanne Calment smoked and she lived to age 122 and 164 days. Extreme statistical outliers are, after all, extreme by definition.