Rules follower wrote:
To "if you really wanted to know", did you even read my post? Did you even try to put two and two together and come up with four?
First of all, where did I blast Vin? Can't find it can you? I posted a general statement for people that were interested. I have no idea if Vin does anything wrong in terms of academic scholarships.
Was that really difficult to comprehened, especially since you were the one to actually post the rules.
And one more time, where did I blast Vin or show any bias?
Mea culpa. I agree, you never blasted Vin. I lumped you in the category of people who claim to know rules, and also claim that Vin violates rules. You are in one but not also (publicly) in the other.
However, you do show an appearance of bias in that you claim how the rules should apply in the context of this thread. Consider this inital statement that summarizes your post: "If a coach is recruiting an athlete and then they are put on an academic scholarship, that would count towards their maximum allowable number of scholarships". Obviously this statement is completely wrong as a patent reading of the rules reveals. Then your post continues on to ask us to reason this through logically. Again, your reasoning, as presented in your post, is not connected to the rules. Patently, a coach can recruit and that recruit can still legally receive an academic scholarship without counting toward the athletic scholarship limit if the rules on exceptions are followed.
Perhaps you do know the rules but can't connect them to a useful contribution to this thread?