I don't know if this post was supposed to be serious or not.
1st- Clearly Bobby is incredibly talented. I remember when he was a sophomore and ran (I think) at the time what was pretty close to or was a sophomore record. I would guess he hadn't been training more then a year or 2, and ran 4:08 or whatever. That is pure talent. He is as talented as Solinsky and Rupp
2nd- I am a big supporter and believer in Bobby (see previous post), but to say he will be better then Rupp or the Wisconsin guys is ludicrous. I have no idea what the future will hold for Solinsky, Teg, Rupp... they may have relatively short careers (thought Teg and Solinsky are now verging on already having long('ish) careers) but I would rather run 26:59 and 12:55 and be done by 30 then 27:10 and 13:05 and be done at 35. Who cares about longevity. The goal is to get as fast as possibly, not to be pretty good for as long as possible. Not saying that Curtis won't run really fast, just saying that running fast in your mid-early late 20s isn't a bad thing. I'm sure Alan Webb is happier with his 3:46 at 25 or whatever he was at the time then having a slow progression until his early 30s that eventually got him down to 3:48 or 3:49.
3rd- He doesn't coach himself. And if he did, how is that a good thing? You need a coach and rather then trumpet that as a positive, you should recognize that not having one will eventually hurt him relative to his nearly equally talented and driven peers.