I see a few other journalists have weighed in. Let me add two bits as one who actually covers the sport:
First, LetsRun has always been a mix of amateur journalism mixed with a fan site. I don't think either of the Johnsons have ever been accused of practicing real journalism.
That they often do a credible and decent job is a tribute to their hard work.
Second, the article was fine. Webb is a public figure by law. Anything he does is fair game. I think some of the word choices were an attempt at imagery, and while imperfect, they certainly accurately conveyed what happened.
I've interviewed Webb. I've interviewed Ray Flynn. They are both decent guys. But the underlying issue here is what is newsworthy to what news outlet.
The article fits well with what LetsRun does and I would have thought what its readers would want to read. Runners World, however, is more of a jogger site and publication and I can't see Amby Burfoot doing the same article.
That doesn't mean what LetsRun published was wrong. These are different audiences.
I am surprised at all the adverse reactions on the message board, but I think it is mainly Webb fans who are upset that he is portrayed in a negative light. I am sorry, but all of our heroes have foibles.