cheap american bastard wrote:
to truly qualify as a "pro," she needed to have actually made some prize money. she never did, therefore your example falls as flat as you do coming off the treadmill. were you the weightlifter chump in that thread?
creepingzll wrote:Not at my school, but a top-ranked runner female athlete who was on a sponsored "elite" team raced for a couple years as a "pro," then went back to grad school under the premise she was still eligible. Went on to be NCAA champ in the 10k a couple years ago.
Nope, wrong. If you get ANYTHING above "actual and necessary expenses," you are, according to the NCAA, a professional. Doesn't have to be prize money.