I'm trying to settle a debate about which event this athlete was best at. This is a HS girl from a small rural school.
100m 12.08
200m 24.25
400m 56.71 (54.xx on a relay)
Long Jump 19-08.25
Triple Jump 42-03.75
If you could rank them 1-5 that would be helpful, thanks.
I'd go:
1. 400
2. TJ
3. LJ
4. 200
5. 100
Question:
Can she hurdle? Try pentathlon- if she's still in HS
runn wrote:
Question:
Can she hurdle? Try pentathlon- if she's still in HS
I'm sure she could if she tried, but she is no longer in HS. She probably would have been good at HJ as well since she's 5'10.
Why do you run in metres and jump in feet!
Come on you must have watched the Olympics and dozens of international meets get with the metric
400m 56.71 (54.xx on a relay) That is too far apart so ignore the 54.xx with an egg timer
WTF is the athlete (you?) running 56 off a 24 - did you stop for a drink at half way?
Not doing the conversion and not in the mood to be helpful
ukathleticscoach wrote:
Why do you run in metres and jump in feet!
Come on you must have watched the Olympics and dozens of international meets get with the metric
400m 56.71 (54.xx on a relay) That is too far apart so ignore the 54.xx with an egg timer
WTF is the athlete (you?) running 56 off a 24 - did you stop for a drink at half way?
Not doing the conversion and not in the mood to be helpful
If you aren't in the mood to be helpful then why post?
No this is not me. It's an athlete that was from a rival school back in HS. About the 56 off a 24, she only ran the 400 one year in HS because she didn't like it. It was "too far".
ukathleticscoach wrote:
Why do you run in metres and jump in feet!
Come on you must have watched the Olympics and dozens of international meets get with the metric
Apparently you are not familar with how a majority of HS in the US present event results. Giving us the time and distances in the way that they were originally earned is easier than the poster converting everything for us. If it bothers you so damn much why don't you do the conversion yourself.