If you cast your eyes over to sub-Sahara Africa, you’ll find all the black leaders over there have one trait in common.
They spend money like there’s no tomorrow, despite the fact their countries are bankrupt and survive on international hand-outs.
That’s probably why, since Obama took office, your national debt has increased an average of $4.9 billion a day.
And you all thought Bush was pretty appalling, running up a debt of an average of $1.7 billion a day during his administration.
How is pouring billions of dollars into the financial sector considered "opposed to capitalism"?
State capitalism=National socialism. Just play with the language like you always do.
Alf Shrubb wrote:
If you cast your eyes over to sub-Sahara Africa, you’ll find all the black leaders over there have one trait in common.
They spend money like there’s no tomorrow, despite the fact their countries are bankrupt and survive on international hand-outs.
The legacy of colonialism.
There are no anti-capitalist US presidents. The millions of dollars that it takes to run a successful campaign are nearly all going to come from contributions from successful capitalists.
How exactly is he aggressively and openly opposed to capitalism?