I am hardly a troll. Quite on the contrary, I am someone who knows 100x more about nutrition than you, and am correcting the BS fad-diet garbage you often spew on here.
Well, if you are going to be accurate in how many carbs you consume, you SHOULD count them, because they have carbs, and if you eats lots of them, then they are contributing carbs to your diet whether you like it or not.
I didn't mention it, I guess others did.
I think that is a pretty bad diet. It goes against every recommendation from every sports nutrition group in the world, including body-building and weightlifting organizations. There is no science to support that such a low carb diet is ideal for anyone, let alone an athlete. So while it may be tolerable for you for now, I don't know what you are trying to prove with it. That you are smarter than everyone else? I think you already failed that test long ago. You probably have low blood sugar all the time.
What does that mean exactly? An ideal ratio would be less 2.0 (over 50 hdl, under 100 ldl). You could be at 55 hdl and 160 ldl and have a ratio "under 3.0" and you would have HIGH ldl cholesterol. I notice how you didn't quote us an LDL #, probably because LDL tends to rise with the higher animal fat diet you are consuming.
THis is meaningless. We have no idea how you tested this body fat, and unless it was DEXA/DXA, it was probably pretty useless. We also have no idea exactly what your diet and exercise regimen was before. Let's theorize for a moment that you did lose body fat. YOu might have achieved exactly the same thing by cutting fat and protein and keeping more carbs. Yeah, that's crazy, huh? Cutting calories while continuing to lift weight leads to losing body fat! Who woulda thunk it?!