ESPN sucks

The point is, they are hurting themselves ... saying a sport that they themselves telecast is boring. Hypocrisy

Has anyone else noticed that SC is getting really gimmicky lately? Between all the stupid athlete twitter updates and meaningless polls, etc., SC has gone way downhill and it is more about celebrity status and such. "Tom Brady was spotted last night twittering at such and such..." It is getting a bit ridiculous.

I am sensing a gap in the market here. It would be great if there were another channel devoted strictly to highlights around the clock. It could be a half hour show even. Just the highlights, no need for witty banter and fluff. I would love a hardcore sports highlight channel and I bet others would too, since SC has become so watered down.

dot dot wrote:

The period goes inside the quotation marks. You'll find your arguments more persuasive if you appear intelligent.

Not if you're from the UK. Actually, putting the period outside of the quotation marks makes much more sense when you consider the fact that the way you punctuate a sentence might not correspond to the way the original material was punctuated. Anyway, I suppose you'll be nit-picking someone about whether or not they use the Oxford comma next.

You know the only thing more boring than the so called "sports" on ESPN...

SportsCenter!

They are a joke. Hack journalist that couldn't make it in the real industry so they had to settle for the sport's world version of Entertainment Tonight.

I feel sad for them. They're nothing but glorified groupies.

Their magazine should be in grocery stores at the check out aisles next to all the other gossip rags.

I mean Keith Olberman used to work there. That's all one needs to know to not watch it.

By the way, did anyone notice during the NBA playoffs that it seemed like Stuart Scott was only seconds away from going down on Magic Johnson?

LOL.

His lazy, crazy eye freaks me out!

i don't really care what they said about track, but the lead story on espn.com this morning was UFC. seriously? first card games, now this shit.

sad. maybe they're playing to the fat-slob non-athlete market.

The fact they are showing more UFC/poker, etc. than t&f is because more people are clamoring for it. If a critical mass of people clamored for t&f (which will never happen), they will show more of it.

Blow up your TV...throw away your papers....

I was listening to Bill Simmons' podcast today on espn.com and once again espn rips track and field, but mostly pole vault.

buttress of windsor wrote:

Has anyone else noticed that SC is getting really gimmicky lately?

No, because I don't watch it anymore. I actually watch very little of espn anymore. I just don't have much interest in what they are showing. Someone mentioned just a half hour all sports show. That is exactly what George Michael did in the 80s.

"As host, George Michael presented clips from the weekend's sporting events from across the United States and sometimes outside of the U.S. Unlike newer sports-related programming, Sports Machine did not usually present commentary or criticism and focused on the highlights, and, often toward the end of the show, an in-depth story about a particular athlete. "

dot dot wrote:

The period goes inside the quotation marks. You'll find your arguments more persuasive if you appear intelligent.

The period is correct as is.

ESPN does suck. Come on, when the play of the day is a baseball player making a catch that's just stupid- it's what they're paid to do.

The bottom line is- they don't understand sports and have no respect for all sports.

I can't play baseball, I think it's boring, but I respect the ability of the people who can play.

ESPN has to appeal to the ignorant American sports fan who is afraid of something different- unless it's curling because any out of shape, couch potato can do that.