First of all - saying that Title IX is a joke, well that is not a "fact" that is just your opinion. It was one of the greatest things that ever happened to me and many girls and women as we came up through a new world of sports - so if you want to state it as your opinion, fine, but it is not a factual statement - most people and parents agree with gender equity.
The greatest thing for girls, one of the worst thing for many men. Look at, for example, Providence Baseball. That team was one of the best in the country, period. Perennial contenders. Title IX comes around, and they unexpectadly have to cut the program. What do you tell the seniors? Sorry, no season? How is that 'gender equity'. And yes, everyone wants gender equity. But at what cost? Do we want to make women as powerful as men by creating more oppurtunities for them, or do we want to make men as powerful as women by taking oppurtunities away from men?
If alumni were allowed to support sport teams, there is an inherent inequity right there - 150 years of sports for men, 30 years for women - who's alumni base is going to be larger? yeah, that's correct. This would create huge disparities in sports.
Sorry, bad point. If theres an alumni from 150 years ago still living, point him out. 30 years ago means 52 year old women, which means in around 10 years the alumni bracket will have evened out.
I've always said the Title IX model needed tweaking - not dissolved. It looks to me that women's enrollment is greater than men's. If the interest, as you state, is not equal to men's traditional sports, then the model is incorrect and needs to be changed to reflect the types of activities the females want or have an interest in. Right now we use a male model - then try to match it on the female side- and perhaps that isn't the most effective.
Womens enrollment is greater than mens because of two reasons. 1) there are more women in the population than men
2) skill jobs, such as automechanic, plumber, electricion...etc...have MUCH more men than women, and those jobs do not need to go to college. Want a better guage? More men are in the workforce than women, and take out teachers, and there are MUCH more men in the workforce than women.
Statements about women getting scholarships who are terrible athletes is just pure bullshit - funny how that gets tossed out there all the time by some ignoramus who again, didn't to their homework. Fact is, it is difficult for anyone to get an athletic scholarship, however, academic scholarships have been going to girls because they appear to be performing well in their academics.
Actually it's not bullshit. University of Michigan sent out an ad in a newspaper saying, quite literally, 'Any Michigan girl willing to participate in the sport of Crew will recieve a scholarship to this univeristy.' That has been done by numerous schools so they can get around title IX. They give out scholarships to 10-15 girls for sports like Archery, Crew, Cheerleading, etc, and it evens out a lot of things.
So please, miss, I am all for gender equity, but do not come on here accusing us of not knowing the facts, when you are the one mistaken.
And yes, the University of Michigan did do that. Sorry.