You must just take times from each meet and combine it in a database. This is not track, times from different courses don't add up.
In their only head to head battle Geneseo beat Cortland handily with 4 before Brunetto who seems to be their 2nd consistently. Since then Cortland has impressed, but on courses that are VERY fast on days that are cool and crisp (Lehigh ran almost 35 seconds faster per girl that ran at SLU the week earlier, and PSU times compared to Lehigh were pretty similar as well).
Geneseo's top 4 ran what looks like somewhat of a controlled/hard effort in packs at Rochester. But it does look like their 5-9 girls had bad days.
This is cross country. Times don't matter, beating people does. Every course is different. I think you have to beat a team to be ranked ahead of them, despite what paper may say.
We will see who is better in two weeks I guess. Geneseo does seem to be falling apart a bit in my eyes, but Cortland had a subpar race this weekend too (No Hollborn and their usual 3rd girl was 5th a whole minute slower than her previous best), the rest of their girls ran slower than Lehigh yet other D1 teams ran the same or faster. The thing about Cortland is that in the past Brunetto, McGrath and others have not put it together in championships before...I hope for their sake they do, but we will see.