Sagarin wrote:
checker wrote:Yes you have to have a bit of talent, but 90% of success is plain-ol guts.
Incorrect. 90% of success is plain-ol talent. The rest is guts and work. Some guys can break 14:00 for 5k off of 40-50 miles per week (I knew a few), and some will never get close even if they run 160 damn hard miles per week. Just as I would have never broken 4:00 (or 4:10 for that matter) for the mile (some guys could never break 5:00) no matter how hard I trained, though Alan Webb made it look easy in high school.
I think natural talent has a HUGE part in how fast someone is capable of running, but I think hard work, diet, training, etc. also plays into it.
The 1st mile I ever ran for time was in 9th grade and I pulled off a BLAZING 6:37! I was actually pretty proud of that, considering I wasn't a runner and I came in 4th place in my gym class out of about 40 or 50 guys.
I started running in 11th grade when my best friend dragged me out for cross country. After a whole 2 weeks of training we had our 1st time trial for 2.5 miles and I ran a 16:22. I thought that great, since I had just 2.5 miles at a 4 second per mile faster pace than my best mile!
I kept training and in my senior year I got down to a 4:25 1500 and a 10:22 3200. I was weighing about 160-165 at the time and was 5' 11"ish.
I went to college, gained 20 lbs or so and weighing about 183, ran a 4:13 1500. After college, I kept running and still weighing about 182/183 I got down to a 3:58 for 1500.
Even though that's not a world class mark and it took me about 8 or 9 years to go from a 6:10 1500 (6:37 mile) down to a 3:58, with an extra 20 lbs. It shows that with enough work, persistance, and luck (little to no injuries) you CAN improve VASTLY with just having normal/moderate natural ability.