149 faster, 125 slower, 4 ties. Looks like the median will is going to be faster than 15:45
149 faster, 125 slower, 4 ties. Looks like the median will is going to be faster than 15:45
NYC possible wrote:
Why exactly are we doing this? It's not like someone is going to compile and average this info.
Someone did. Check out the main page.
Bunz Zero wrote:
14:19
This puts me in the same no-mans-land as the guy that posted 13:59. It's good enough to win a lot of college meets, but wouldn't get you very far in Nationals or at any higher level of running. So we might as well be 14:50 guys. It's all the same if you end up sitting in a cubicle for the next 30 years anyway.
I suffer from a similar affliction:
14:22
15:56 (way too slow for the training/quality of workouts i do) overtraining maybe?
WORKU BIKILA!
Need Moar women lets runners.
16:35, 31 years ago in HS.
13.59.2 with a 57 last lap to break 14min.
To add to the data set:
15.00.00 (yeah, would have like an extra 100th...
We have the same pr!
14:22
15:05
16:19
18:24 in 1982
15:39
was windy, raining, cold, and my only option was to go out hard (i was stuck between the leaders and slow chase pack).
14:36
16:05
15:08
15:23
My 5K PR (Long time ago-1985) 15:25
16.48 this year. 16.18 overall...
Be Honest! wrote:
Post em up and lets see if my reality is a dream.