That's not true, if you hit the "A" standard in an event in track, you can run a different event, as long as it's within reason. Dig through the rules, it's in there somewhere. It just doesn't happen, because most people want to run the race that they have the "A" standard in. Sometimes they double up, though.
run234 wrote:
the "B" qualifiers did indeed know in advance what it meant to not meet the "A" standard. I feel more empathy toward the guys who ran 2:21, but anyone who opted not to qualify through a marathon knew in advance that they would then not qualify for "A" standard incentives.
You should NOT be able to qualify for the Olympic Trials MARATHON with a 5k/10k time. Does Alan Webb qualify for the 10k? Or better, do "A" standard marathon runners qualify for the 10k? If not, why? Because there's no room on the track, right? Make heats.
If athletes planned accordingly, made sacrifices in training/racing, then they (perhaps) could have met the "A" qualifying standards. Since people like Dan Browne did take the time/effort to qualify through a marathon, he will have to deal with "B" standard treatment.