1 Angelo TAYLOR USA 45.25
2 John STEFFENSEN AUS 45.64
3 Darold WILLIAMSON USA 45.74
4 Sanjay AYRE JAM 45.95
5 Martyn ROONEY GBR 46.37
6 Ato MODIBO TRI 47.33
Oscar PISTORIUS RSA DQ
Jeremy WARINER USA DNF
1 Angelo TAYLOR USA 45.25
2 John STEFFENSEN AUS 45.64
3 Darold WILLIAMSON USA 45.74
4 Sanjay AYRE JAM 45.95
5 Martyn ROONEY GBR 46.37
6 Ato MODIBO TRI 47.33
Oscar PISTORIUS RSA DQ
Jeremy WARINER USA DNF
He was Dq'ed for running with illegal instruments.
namely, legs.
Are you f***ing retarted? He doesn't have legs.
wrong dano wrote:
Are you f***ing retarted? He doesn't have legs.
well done dano you really got 'i love peeps' on that one.
Thanks f***er, better than you putting the results up with a title saying he was DQd yet you don't say why. Thanks for that, very nice of you.
Okay...so why was he DQed?
Running on the line, they mentioned about it on the bbc, but they didn't show a close up replay
well, I can clearly see now why reading comprehension was added to standardized tests.
Idiots like you are barely worth talking to. Maybe if you died in the sand or something getting oil for me and your girlfriend and sisters I might care, but then again thats probably not your 'type' of thing now is it?
and your post illustrates why english composition should be added to standardized tests.
Ok, here's a lesson for you. You said, "He was disqualified for using illegal insturments. nameley, legs." Namely means specifically. Your sentence implies the illegal insturments he used are legs. Those aren't illegal. He doesn't have them. If you had said "He was disqualified for not having legal insturments. namely, legs." You would have been good. Instead you're a f***ing retard who tries to act smart when you have no f***ing clue.
Logic test:
He 'ran' didn't he? You can not run without Legs.
You fail.
It just so happens, his 'legs' aren't real now are they? They are made of metal. Thus, being Dq'ed for using something such as that, that can be termed as an 'illegal instrument' that 'aids in the act of running' is completely logical. This is the whole argument surrounding this guy.
Gee Gosh Golly, I didn't start the argument.
When you gonna get me my oil, your pig of a girlfriend wants me to shovel more cheese nips into her gullet. Maybe I should just dump her off in the projects or something, you wouldn't mind would you? I mean you'd be a decaying corpse in the mud, forgotten.
What do you call what he does if it is not running?
He ran outside of his lane.
He was in last and finished at 47.65
I love peeps wrote:
He was Dq'ed for running with illegal instruments.
namely, legs.
You are the one who said he ran, not me. Good call.
wrong dano wrote:
What do you call what he does if it is not running?
well, without his metal legs, it would be pretty dam ugly and would not qualify as running.
and look, I respect the guy, he runs fast and doesn't have any calf muscles etc. But I don't know how much those metal legs help him. The probably help a lot more than has been shown. However, is it still hard for him? Yeah. Would he be a 45 or 44 guy with real legs? Hell yes he would.
I love peeps wrote:
It just so happens, his 'legs' aren't real now are they? They are made of metal.
Actually they are made of carbon-fibre. You can't get anything right, can you?
how do you get any traction on those things when the track is wet?
half pie wrote:
Jeremy WARINER USA DNF
Anyone know why?
wrong dano wrote:
I love peeps wrote:He was Dq'ed for running with illegal instruments.
namely, legs.
You are the one who said he ran, not me. Good call.
yeah he "RAN" with "LEGS" that aren't "REAL" whats so hard to get about that? He couldn't run without his fake legs. Do you not understand that? He would be running on stumps, which wouldn't be running, it would be, well I don't know what it would be. You might call it stumping? I dunno.
My point to you is simple: You need legs to run. He doesn't have real legs, he has fake legs. Since he has fake legs that assist his body in the act of running, and in fact make it possible for him to run, it can be argued that he using an 'illegal instrument' that improves his performance and is thusly illegal. Its not very hard to understand.
If I put springs in my shoes is that cheating? Yes. If I ride a bike in a race does it count what my time is for running? No. The whole point about athletics is that the body is not assisted in its performance. Its the body performing to the best of 'its' ability, and not some piece of metal.
Can he 'run' a 47 point without his 'legs'. No.
running man wrote:
half pie wrote:Jeremy WARINER USA DNF
Anyone know why?
someone on another tread said he 'fell out of his blocks' and was waiting for everyone to be recalled but it never happened.