They are already incorrect statements within the first 2minutes of this film.
I guess later in the movie they will show a graph of the annual temprature of some selected villages and say "look there is no warming".
Maybe these folks know more than you do.
they also know more than 99% of all scientists around the world cause they are the superscientists.
They must be working with Rev. Jerry Falwell. He was preachin' yesterday and said we don't need to be huggin' on trees 'cause God was gonna' make sure the planet was O.K. and we should keep on doin' what we been doin'. Then he had some fancy Scripture words 'bout harvesting in Spring and Fall and whatnot and we jus' nodded with approval.
Global warming is 100% truely happening and can be proven.
What you can't say, is what is causing it.
Go back and look at where the bread-basket of the modern world was in the year 525 A.D.
You'll find global warming has turned that place of the world into a dessert.
Of course, all that happened before Al Gore's cause for global warming (the automobile) was even invented......
Global warming, yes.
Natural phenominom..... also yes.
I'm guessing you are joking, or you don't travel much.
Buddybu wrote:
They are already incorrect statements within the first 2minutes of this film.
Which statements in the first 2 minutes are incorrect?
googs wrote:
I'm guessing you are joking, or you don't travel much.
hows does traveling have anything to do wih it?..
the average temprature is going up..(dramticly of the last several decades)...and greenhouse gas emmisions have followed the same trend..
that is called a correlation...a strong one in this case.that infers a conection...doesnt PROVE a connection...(science doesnt PROVE anything by the way...just supports to one degree or another)
[quote]Hmmmm... wrote:
You'll find global warming has turned that place of the world into a dessert.
quote]
mmmmm - where is this sweet land of dessert? Are there lakes of chocolate and lolipop street signs?
why would he be joking hes exactly right what are u talking about not traveling much
Sam F wrote:
the average temprature is going up..(dramticly of the last several decades)...and greenhouse gas emmisions have followed the same trend..
that is called a correlation...a strong one in this case.that infers a conection...doesnt PROVE a connection...(science doesnt PROVE anything by the way...just supports to one degree or another)
I think you should go to 20:00 into the film. This is exactly what NASA's James Hansen says about the misinterpretation of the data from the ice cores.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9005566792811497638&q=the+great+swindleWell ..he would be in the extreme minority...
i can post things that say the fossil record has been misinterpreted...and the earth is actaully much younger than most scientist would tell you...but i will not..
im not going to explain the nature of Consensus....ill just say this...google video is not primary Lit.
See Oh Two wrote:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9005566792811497638&q=the+great+swindle
This is facinating---thanks!
Sam F wrote:
Well ..he would be in the extreme minority...
i can post things that say the fossil record has been misinterpreted...and the earth is actaully much younger than most scientist would tell you...but i will not..
im not going to explain the nature of Consensus....ill just say this...google video is not primary Lit.
You're an idiot. You're talking global warming and you don't have a clue who James Hansen is? HAHAHA. He's the first global warming alarmist. He's also a scientist, who can't stand it when blowhards like Al Gore misuses the data.
The largest source of atmospheric CO2 are the oceans, thousands of times more CO2 comes from the ocean than man. The glacial ice cores shows that CO2 concentration follows temperature by about 800 years. This is NOT what Al Gore, who took 2 science courses while at Yale, barely passing each.
Global temperature are directly correlated to solar activity, which man has absolutely NO input in.
Oh really...it doesnt matter if darwin comes back from the dead and says he was wrong about creationisim is wrong..
he still follows the rules of peer review..
now if you would like to post a link to a well sighted scientific article that argues against Global-warming ...i will read it from front to back...
but i can post 20 that say that global warming is real for every one that you do..
Hmmmm... wrote:
Global warming, yes.
Natural phenominom..... also yes.
First, the word is phenomenon. If you can't even ^%*!ing write, I somehow doubt that you are well educated about climate change. There was a huge thread on this a few weeks back that degenerated into a massive waste of time, because the debate is dominated by people who think that reading a few random Youtube and Google hits makes them well informed.
Deny it all you want, but the facts are:
1. You've never read a scientific paper about climate.
2. You don't know what you are talking about.
3. You've swallowed a load of crap from industries that have a direct interest in keeping emissions laws weak.
4. You are getting ready to write a repy telling me that Al Gore has brainwashed me.
Guess what? Al Gore did not produce any of the data in his movie... but he did a good job of summarizing the clear conclusions of 30 years of climate research by 1000s of researchers.
P.S...
i dont consider Al Gores movie a Peer reviewed source either..and i never mentioned him at all.
That video is propaganda. It has no dissenting opinions, rebuttals or debate. And it is also wrong, if you're not sure about the effects of human generated carbon on climate change then you should do more research than just watching this movie. I'm not saying don't watch it, just know that it is one sided and has an extreme point of view.
...well if you understude the scientific data ..the majority think that global warming is real..and is caused by humans...there is actaully very little debate...and it is over minor details..
just like most fields of science