if then... wrote:
if its one and done...then why is florida in the title game...did i miss something? was florida undefeated?
Here is a sample of the people deciding the FB championship:
"If you beat a team one time, why do they get the national championship if they win the second time?," said Earle Bruce, the former Ohio State coach who votes in the Harris Interactive poll and moved Florida ahead of Michigan. "I mean, they've already played one time and lost."
I hope this idiot voted Boise State #2, or he better be prepared to argue Auburn or someone who beat them as the #1 team if Fl wins the game.
I feel FL and MI are equally worthy, but it is kind of sad that MI was essentially passed over because USC lost. My impression was that MI would have been ahead of Fl had USC won.
For all you experts arguing the case of either team, how is it possible to determine who is second best without a game? Unexpected results happen EVERY year in the BCS. Some of you must have no memory. ALL of you fanboys would reverse your arguments if you were a fan of the opposite team. Both MI and Fl have enough talent to beat OSU on a neutral field, and both deserve a shot to play in a tournament.
Also, how does the BCS lose money by having a playoff? It's not like the BCS games would be any less popular (more so in my opinion), and the sh*t bowls would be 10,000x times more interesting.