You've already posted that excuse for doping on another thread.
Who was talking about doping? Did you read the subject line?
This thread is about her performance. According to the OP, this thread is not about whether she doped: "I'm not gonna say whether she's dirty or not, as that's not the intention of my thread. The only thing I want to point out is that her performance today was not out of the realm of possiblity."
It makes complete sense to link the article here as a follow on reply to Aussiestatman, who also talked about pacing and shoes.
You're just finding whatever you can to argue she is clean when the general reaction to what she has done is disbelief in its genuineness. You posted that stuff above on the Burfoot thread to try to counter what he has said in his article (the parts you didn't read).
You've already posted that excuse for doping on another thread.
You obviously didn't read it if you think it's an excuse for doping. But you are like the people you despise, you only look for confirmation bias. That's why you will never evolve.
Says a doping denier. I won't evolve into what you clearly are.
Who was talking about doping? Did you read the subject line?
This thread is about her performance. According to the OP, this thread is not about whether she doped: "I'm not gonna say whether she's dirty or not, as that's not the intention of my thread. The only thing I want to point out is that her performance today was not out of the realm of possiblity."
It makes complete sense to link the article here as a follow on reply to Aussiestatman, who also talked about pacing and shoes.
You're just finding whatever you can to argue she is clean when the general reaction to what she has done is disbelief in its genuineness. You posted that stuff above on the Burfoot thread to try to counter what he has said in his article (the parts you didn't read).
It wasn't hard to find -- it is linked in the very same Amby Burfoot article right at the top -- which I found when reading the whole article.
But in any case, this thread isn't about doping, nor Amby Burfoot. Ciao bye-bye.
Ruth is clean until proven guilty, speculation and personal opinions don't matter in track and field. Results matter rather it's a performance or a drug results, those are the only two concrete tangible things in track and field. DEAL WITH IT!
You obviously didn't read it if you think it's an excuse for doping. But you are like the people you despise, you only look for confirmation bias. That's why you will never evolve.
Says a doping denier. I won't evolve into what you clearly are.
Find one post where I have denied the effects of doping. Oh, you can't? Then why don't you shut up, you stupid lying fool?
Your whole premise is that Kiptums WR SHOULD be faster...but its not. So its kinda a straw man argument. You have no idea if Kiptum could have run any faster with a pacer.