One thing that concerns me, following the news about the Herron/Holt Wikipedia controversy on Monday, is the aggressive backlash on social media and forums like this one. Clearly, they have done things very, very wrong here. Both the manipulation of Wikipedia articles and the attitude towards other athletes who have broken records or in other ways done achievements that are popular in the ultrarunning community. And Conor Holt's email, where he took all responsibility, didn't really make things better...
But my point is: why do people take this opportunity to kick someone when they're down? Isn't that exactly what we accuse Camille and Conor of doing?
Yes, it's good that things come to the surface and that the people involved in these things get to understand the consequences of their acts. But we're dealing with someone here, who obviously has major issues with self-esteem and struggling with her mental health. A human being.
I really do hope that the Wikipedia controversy will ring a bell for Camille and Conor. However much they may think they are technically correct, the abusive language and acting as if they are the ultimate authorities in deciding ahead of official processes are simply inflaming the entire situation, damages their credibility and hurts people.
But there is still a way to reverse this downward spiral. There is still a way to have their eyes opened to how the ultrarunning community works and how people are treating each other. Ian Corless made some good points about this on his website.
Whether this happens or not, I don't know. I just don't think it helps with the rest of us abusing them with the same kind of language we don't like when they have used.
I wrote (in Swedish, Google Translated) about the Wikipedia controversy and putting the current happenings in some kind of context.
This is a tragic story with many sides to it. My hope is that it will bring out the best in the ultrarunning community, not the worst. Both in Camille & Conor and in the rest of us.