Email from Conor Holt (Camille Herron's husband) taking responsibility for Wikipedia edits

Editing the wiki page of other athletes is protecting her from bullying?

OK

Even if this is true, this conveniently would be the perfect go-to excuse if she was actually the one editing the pages so the credibility is dubious. Nevertheless it's obviously not a good look, but I'm not going to pretend like I follow Ultrarunning so I'll continue to sit back and observe this from a distance.

what a delusional person - "camille is the real victim in all of this" is such a tonedeaf stance to take.

"Trust us, it was Ohtani's interpreter doing all the gambling!"

letsTMZ.com

C.Fred - 275,604 edits
Melcous - 120,305 edits
Steven Walling - 49,492 edits
LilianaUwU - 41,000 edits

Editors with these kinds of edit numbers are basically full-time Wikipedia editors. If you look at their edit histories, they literally edit thousands of topics. People like this do not have the time to "bully" any particular person. They spend all their time correcting inaccuracies and updating pages are they need updating. It is basically a full-time job for them. A quick look at their edits of the Herron page do not indicate any type of cyber bullying. But have a look for yourself -- all of their edits are below.

I call total BS. Sorry, she has this man in a b-sack lock. How, not sure? But until SHE takes responsibility and stops blaming ghost bullies, she needs to be looked upon with skepticism.

So he acted alone and intentionally deleted or omitted accomplishments from other athletes because Camille was getting bullied? I call bull$h*t on this one.

>>I found an email sent Sept 20 in my spam account yesterday after the article was published!

>>Plus we have been traveling the last few days with limited access!

.

Which is it? It went to spam? Or you have been traveling & unable to do email? Multiple excuses stink.

Nailed it.

I don't have the link on hand, but earlier today a tweet from Camille's twitter account claimed she had nothing to do with the edits and suggested that it was a bad actor framing her. How does that square with Conor taking responsibility for the edits and the implication from his email that he has control of her social media accounts?

So did Yiannis Kouros also bully Camille?

Rundbowie edited there too:

en.wikipedia.org

Yiannis Kouros: Revision history - Wikipedia

Link:en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yia...

There's a sick ideology in the running world that has hijacked people's empathy, desire to be inclusive and kind and stand up to abuse, and use it to promote themselves and protect themselves from criticism. It is so much so that they believe in the delusion.

This email from Conor is narcissistic and delusional.

Social justice issues of racism, abuse, and sexism are real but when one person uses it to turn themselves and themselves only into a victim, you should give some side eye.

Cyber bullies? These editors explained clearly why they were making the changes. If you go back far enough, her wikipedia page is insane. No one's page is like that. No, Camille isn't known for eating tacos. She's hardly known at all.

Criticism isn't cyberbullying. It's not abusive or toxic. no one hurt you, Conor, get a life.

And while we're at it, I hope more people stop giving these crappy influencers in the sport so much attention. The overly self promotional ones, the ones who haven't run a major race in years but are still out there spamming us with content. It's exhausting.

There is zero chance they published this article without reaching out to him beforehand, and zero chance it went to spam.

Objectively false, just saying. There are plenty of people with autism (even to the extent that it affects their life) that die without a diagnosis

Weak denial that already has holes being poked in it.