You know that nobody owes you anything, right? And they aren't likely to waste their time trying to prove anything to you, that you are going to reject anyway.
Why would anyone bother with someone (you) who doesn't even know that eye witness testimony is primary evidence, it is evidence, and it is the most common form of evidence? We've been around and around on this.
The people that mattered, which does not include some keyboard warriors embarrassing themselves on a message board (you, again), were the jury members.
They spoke.
"Guilty, your Honor."
That was a lot of words when you could have just said "Yes, there was no corroborating evidence. "
So he has not made any YouTube videos in 7 days. I guess that he has been silenced.
The girl comes over to get laid. gets laid. then claims assault once she finds out she wasn’t the only girl getting laid that day.
meanwhile, he’s living his life barking about big pharma (he’s correct) and big government (also correct), builds an audience that keeps growing, and then those who can only accept one opinion tries to silence him, but
I didn't pay much attention to Russell Brand even though I like some of his recent videos, when these allegations came out I figured he might be guilty, maybe not, don't know don't care either way. When Youtube demonetized him I figured meh, what can you do.
However when the UK Parliament started pressuring companies to demonetize him and ruin his chance to make a living I am now 100 PERCENT on Russell Brand's side. These financial slavery tactics NEED to fail. This is NOT how democracies function.
So all the raping, etc, is completely irrelevant to you now because someone in a government said something?
It's such a blessing that you guys are very unlikely to ever procreate.
So all the raping, etc, is completely irrelevant to you now because someone in a government said something?
It's such a blessing that you guys are very unlikely to ever procreate.
All the raping?
LetsRape, at it again. Sally, newname, yankee, all complete and utter scum. How the BroJos can see these posts and think “Yeah, this is what I want my life’s work to be associated with!” is beyond me and so completely embarrassing that I’d probably slit my throat.
LetsRape, at it again. Sally, newname, yankee, all complete and utter scum. How the BroJos can see these posts and think “Yeah, this is what I want my life’s work to be associated with!” is beyond me and so completely embarrassing that I’d probably slit my throat.
No need to get your panties in a bunch. No need to slit your throat. I think it is highly likely that Masterson and Brand are both rapists - but with Masterson I have not seen one iota of corroborating evidence. That is all.
but with Masterson I have not seen one iota of corroborating evidence. That is all.
So you think the judge and jury got it wrong?
Not saying that at all. I have never said Masterson was innocent. Again, I think he is a rapist and deserves to be locked away for 30 years. But so far, I have only seen the accusations from the women. Not one iota of corroborating evidence. I have seen the accusations from the women. Very powerful. I was just wondering if there was corroborating evidence to support those allegations and I have yet to see any.
Not saying that at all. I have never said Masterson was innocent. Again, I think he is a rapist and deserves to be locked away for 30 years. But so far, I have only seen the accusations from the women. Not one iota of corroborating evidence. I have seen the accusations from the women. Very powerful. I was just wondering if there was corroborating evidence to support those allegations and I have yet to see any.
I don't really even like the guy. But I think everyone should have due process. Otherwise, we have a kangaroo court.
Not saying that at all. I have never said Masterson was innocent. Again, I think he is a rapist and deserves to be locked away for 30 years. But so far, I have only seen the accusations from the women. Not one iota of corroborating evidence. I have seen the accusations from the women. Very powerful. I was just wondering if there was corroborating evidence to support those allegations and I have yet to see any.
I don't really even like the guy. But I think everyone should have due process. Otherwise, we have a kangaroo court.
In what way was he denied due process? Did the trail not take place within the US court system? Do you not understand the role testimony plays in our justice system?
Seems like a millionaire white male in this country could have easily had charges dismissed if there was 'no evidence' and/or 'just accusations'
I don't really even like the guy. But I think everyone should have due process. Otherwise, we have a kangaroo court.
In what way was he denied due process? Did the trail not take place within the US court system? Do you not understand the role testimony plays in our justice system?
Seems like a millionaire white male in this country could have easily had charges dismissed if there was 'no evidence' and/or 'just accusations'
I am not saying he was denied due process. Again, I understand that witness can be very powerful and can be sufficient to convict someone. But, I have been told there was more than just the allegations. I am asking - where is it?
This is the problem with you Americans - especially in politics but in life as well. You have to be absolute evangelicals for one side or the other and there is no compromise or nuance to be had.
Either Russel is a rapist scum or he’s a media conspiracy victim.
I’ll admit before this news broke I was a bit of an R.B fan. Liked his little rants and thought he was a smart guy. In the last year though it seemed he was getting increasingly conspiracy-esq and kind of sucked into that “say the counter thing for more views” culture so he got a little more boring to watch.
As for the accusations. Can’t we just admit it’s early days and let’s see how the facts play out? When there’s 1 kind of unhinged lady with a vendetta at first assessment something like this I would lean towards “probably false or overblown accusation but let’s still wait for the facts”. When it’s a group of women with viable sounding stories though I lean towards “it’s not looking great for R.B but before I call him a rapist I’ll also wait for the facts”.
1 pretty bad sounding story that just surfaced was the radio show where he said he should his Willy to a lady and she had actually filed a complaint in 2019 with the bbc which they didn’t act on - this sounds quite legit as he is on air talking about it.
This is the problem with you Americans - especially in politics but in life as well. You have to be absolute evangelicals for one side or the other and there is no compromise or nuance to be had.
Either Russel is a rapist scum or he’s a media conspiracy victim.
I'm not an American, but would like to defend them here over this part of your message. I think that the vast majority of American's (49%) call themselves independents, leaving the other half split between the rest. I think that these message boards or perhaps social media in general simply gives a voice to those on the far sides of the spectrum, but don't think that either of them truly represent the average person who is more concerned with their everyday lives.
LetsRape, at it again. Sally, newname, yankee, all complete and utter scum. How the BroJos can see these posts and think “Yeah, this is what I want my life’s work to be associated with!” is beyond me and so completely embarrassing that I’d probably slit my throat.
Maybe some day you will be accused with no evidence and have everyone assume you are guilty.
I didn't pay much attention to Russell Brand even though I like some of his recent videos, when these allegations came out I figured he might be guilty, maybe not, don't know don't care either way. When Youtube demonetized him I figured meh, what can you do.
However when the UK Parliament started pressuring companies to demonetize him and ruin his chance to make a living I am now 100 PERCENT on Russell Brand's side. These financial slavery tactics NEED to fail. This is NOT how democracies function.
So all the raping, etc, is completely irrelevant to you now because someone in a government said something?
It's such a blessing that you guys are very unlikely to ever procreate.
If he raped someone then the UK government should try him in a court of law and convict him on the evidence. Instead they're skipping the due process and harassing his sources of income. That sickens me. Honestly think that through for a moment, the government is trying to bankrup the guy BEFORE convicting him of a crime. Disgusting!
Strange how the one guy repeatedly caught on camera that day making violent threats and calling for insurrection was never charged, arrested, tried, convicted or jailed. So odd. Hmm. His name is Ray Epps and he lives peacefully in Arizona. You can't explain why he never faced justice because the truth would obliterate everything you think you know about that day.
Here you go, Mookie. The truth that obliterates everything you though you knew about that day.
Ray Epps, a onetime Donald Trump supporter who was the target of a conspiracy theory about the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge for his role in the riot.
If he raped someone then the UK government should try him in a court of law and convict him on the evidence. Instead they're skipping the due process and harassing his sources of income. That sickens me. Honestly think that through for a moment, the government is trying to bankrup the guy BEFORE convicting him of a crime. Disgusting!
So no comment on the text messages where he essentially apologises to the woman when she gets angry at him for raping him?
If he raped someone then the UK government should try him in a court of law and convict him on the evidence. Instead they're skipping the due process and harassing his sources of income. That sickens me. Honestly think that through for a moment, the government is trying to bankrup the guy BEFORE convicting him of a crime. Disgusting!
So no comment on the text messages where he essentially apologises to the woman when she gets angry at him for raping him?
Do you think 'no means no' Kokinho?
The only thing we know for sure is that she came over for sex and got what she was there for. beyond that, need a trial. we know that no does not mean no sex, or she would not have knocked on the door…so could be
no means no = not a threesome
no means no = not that type of sex
no means no = no filming
no means no = no animals
no means no = many many things
She never used the word rape, unless the stupid troll read something we missed.