I always laugh when people complain about the messageboard being contentious. Why does it bother people to read arguments that they don’t agree with? I feel like we should all be trying to learn and enjoy being challenged. But so many people, most people actually, are looking for affirmation not information.
Is he ACTUALLY going to be arrested or is he just saying this for attention? I wouldn’t put that past him, and I also wouldn’t put it past him to claim this when it’s false, then when he’s still a free man on Wednesday claim that the reds were too scared to come for him, that this proves once and for all he’s innocent of everything he’s ever been accused of, or some other such claim. It feels like the media is just falling for the same basic trick he used in them repeatedly throughout his initial campaign and presidency.
As one friend of mine at work said "You steal the guy's presidency, and now you want to put him in jail for it? You really think they people won't rise up?"
when you take on the responsibility of running a contentious message board, only a very ignorant, self-centered individual would use it to further their own views.
Did anyone say cesspool?
I always laugh when people complain about the messageboard being contentious. Why does it bother people to read arguments that they don’t agree with? I feel like we should all be trying to learn and enjoy being challenged. But so many people, most people actually, are looking for affirmation not information.
Thank you for responding, much appreciated.
Because when things get ugly, and yes, they do so quite often on this forum, we turn to you and to the mods to be neutral and fair. It is a very important role, even if just for the appearances.
But when the people who run the show initiate the lopsided opinions, it creates the unsettling feeling that things are stacked towards one side and are anything but being fairly handled.
That is a sacrifice a good moderator/arbitrator/administrator makes, in exchange for the feeling that this is a fair and unbiased forum.
You transgressed badly in this regard, unfortunately.
Is he ACTUALLY going to be arrested or is he just saying this for attention? I wouldn’t put that past him, and I also wouldn’t put it past him to claim this when it’s false, then when he’s still a free man on Wednesday claim that the reds were too scared to come for him, that this proves once and for all he’s innocent of everything he’s ever been accused of, or some other such claim. It feels like the media is just falling for the same basic trick he used in them repeatedly throughout his initial campaign and presidency.
100%
1) Trump is in the news again 2) Patriots will donate money 3) Libs go home devastated when Trump isn't arrested
Gotta give it to him, it's an absolute dynamite formula
You wouldn't see the main platform of another sport cranking out this kind of top tier, apropos of nothing content
Fair enough. But this is a messageboard with a filter and I specifically posted this under non-running content. I could have posted it under a fake name, maybe that would have been better? But critics constantly complain about anonymity.
The messageboard has always been where people can discuss whatever they want. I say it's what the you'd talk about on a long run with your friends.
That's a lie and you know it. Your mods delete anything that does not suit them or your underlying agenda here.
I always laugh when people complain about the messageboard being contentious. Why does it bother people to read arguments that they don’t agree with? I feel like we should all be trying to learn and enjoy being challenged. But so many people, most people actually, are looking for affirmation not information.
Thank you for responding, much appreciated.
Because when things get ugly, and yes, they do so quite often on this forum, we turn to you and to the mods to be neutral and fair. It is a very important role, even if just for the appearances.
But when the people who run the show initiate the lopsided opinions, it creates the unsettling feeling that things are stacked towards one side and are anything but being fairly handled.
That is a sacrifice a good moderator/arbitrator/administrator makes, in exchange for the feeling that this is a fair and unbiased forum.
You transgressed badly in this regard, unfortunately.
Thanks for asking.
Here's an analogy.
One could say that spirited cheering is good during a sports event, and what's wrong with that? Well, when it is the referee doing the cheering for one side or the other, or for anything, really, it is understood as inappropriate.
You, rojo, are the referee.
It behooves all of us to have the referees stay neutral and behind the scenes, please.
Witch nut, witch hunt, But Hillary, But Hillary, But Hunter, But Hunter !!! The battle cry of the the Defenders of a Seditious Traitor !!
Yeah, sure a witch hunt???
Bill and Hillary are just unjustly connected to over 80 people that died under mysterious circumstances. I didn't say hurt, beat up, abused, which are all wrong, I said DIED. I remember one poster on the conservative side pointing out a link to Snopes about a liberal and the most arrogant poster EVER on these boards laughed at Snopes. Then the same poster linked to Snopes claiming the body count was a right-wing conspiracy, so now Snopes is a reputable source? How's that work?
Anything that Trump did that was factually illegal and can be proven, then he should face the consequences. The same rules should apply to the Biden, Obama and Clinton Families, but they don't.
Please, take a seat now:
If Hunter Biden were Trump's son doing exactly 100% what Hunter has done, you left-wingers would be ALL over it day and night. But...you don't own anything, you just deflect and turn into crickets. Biden claiming to not know or have anything to do with his son's dealing? Yeah, ok. If Trump said the same thing, I'd respond the same way.
If Trump were accused of being connected to 6 people dying mysteriously ( ot over 80!) the MAIN liberals on this site would be posting it day after day and I'd do my own research and probably agree---that's the final straw, having someone killed to silence them ().
My link doesn't count, right? But if it were about Trump, then you're all happy lads, eh? I've seen that with the top 3 liberals on the Biden Thread. They know it, but they lie.
Boys on the Tracks ()? Mary Mahoney? If you can't explain it away, just call it a right wing conspiracy and don't say anything else.
Mara Leveritt’s 1999 book Boys on the Tracks: Death, Denial, and a Mother’s Crusade to Bring Her Son’s Killers to Justice is one of the most important examples of investigative journalism in modern Arkansas history. The book’...
The above is one of many reasons that there is very little civility in posts about Trump or Biden.
As for Rojo's post, call me wrong Rojo, and I may be, but I don't see Trump being arrested. I also didn't see Hillary Clinton getting arrested in the Winter of 2018 as my friend claimed who happens to be a far, far right-winger. He heard it from a YouTube channel called Q, which I've never seen. I told him "she's not getting arrested" and was told, you'll see.
There is no right or wrong anymore, it's just left-wing or right-wing, period. I don't care about upvotes or downvotes, does zero to my ego. This is just a minute forum with a couple dozen people commenting out of approximately 258 million 18 and over adults in this country. Go ahead, voice your opinion, but own the truth on both sides. Biden made some terrible decisions on his FIRST day in the office, but...but...but...but... Glass Houses.
Bill Clinton has an unbroken string of complaints about sexual impropriety all the way back to Oxford. He used campaign funds to silence Juanita Broaddrick. Edwards used campaign funds to pay off his deeds, but wasn't prosecuted. I don't even want to talk about Biden.
Unequal application of the law is the real crime.
Trump acknowledged his womanizing and it was decades ago. Find me someone who hasn't sinned.
What this is really about, is the same thing it's always been about. Anything to disqualify Trump from running again and to destroy him so no one else will dare to "buck" the system of grift.
1) Juanita Broaddrick changed her story several times, and when questioned by Ken Starr she denied that she was paid. You know Starr would have indicted Bill Clinton if he had the chance.
2) Edwards was indicted and went to trial, and the jury did not convict. The details of Edwards case were different than Trump's case. I guess we will see what the jury thinks about the details in Trump's case.
3) Trump 'acknowledged' his 'womanizing'?? Uh he keeps denying in the cases of Daniels and E Jean Carroll. I don't think 'womanizing' is the proper word.
But I AGREE, we need equal application of the law. That's why we need to charge Trump with his many crimes. Investigations have been ongoing and now indictment season is starting. NO KINGS.
Fair enough. But this is a messageboard with a filter and I specifically posted this under non-running content. I could have posted it under a fake name, maybe that would have been better? But critics constantly complain about anonymity.
The messageboard has always been where people can discuss whatever they want. I say it's what the you'd talk about on a long run with your friends.
That's a lie and you know it. Your mods delete anything that does not suit them or your underlying agenda here.
There is definitely some truth to this person's post and to not admit that is clearly not being honest. It happens a lot Rojo. Maybe not your fault, but some "delete happy moderators" with the power of a keyboard at their disposal;)
As one friend of mine at work said "You steal the guy's presidency, and now you want to put him in jail for it? You really think they people won't rise up?"
President Trump has put out the word that he wants his supporters out in the streets when this arrest goes down. There is urgency. You can bet your azz there will be a lot more Trump supporters than law enforcement can handle.
One could say that spirited cheering is good during a sports event, and what's wrong with that? Well, when it is the referee doing the cheering for one side or the other, or for anything, really, it is understood as inappropriate.
You, rojo, are the referee.
It behooves all of us to have the referees stay neutral and behind the scenes, please.
This is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read. Rojo isn’t the referee. And completely different. Mods and brojos can have whatever opinions they want. The mods remove stuff that is offensive not pro or against an argument
President Trump has put out the word that he wants his supporters out in the streets when this arrest goes down. There is urgency. You can bet your azz there will be a lot more Trump supporters than law enforcement can handle.
People are allowed to protest. If they do something illegal they should be arrested.
If you bring up one day, January 6th, don’t forget the 3 plus months of protests burning down cities and Biden, through “stealth encouragement” for the BLM and LGBT protests.
Because when things get ugly, and yes, they do so quite often on this forum, we turn to you and to the mods to be neutral and fair. It is a very important role, even if just for the appearances.
But when the people who run the show initiate the lopsided opinions, it creates the unsettling feeling that things are stacked towards one side and are anything but being fairly handled.
That is a sacrifice a good moderator/arbitrator/administrator makes, in exchange for the feeling that this is a fair and unbiased forum.
You transgressed badly in this regard, unfortunately.
Thanks for asking.
Here's an analogy.
One could say that spirited cheering is good during a sports event, and what's wrong with that? Well, when it is the referee doing the cheering for one side or the other, or for anything, really, it is understood as inappropriate.
You, rojo, are the referee.
It behooves all of us to have the referees stay neutral and behind the scenes, please.
Bill Clinton has an unbroken string of complaints about sexual impropriety all the way back to Oxford. He used campaign funds to silence Juanita Broaddrick. Edwards used campaign funds to pay off his deeds, but wasn't prosecuted. I don't even want to talk about Biden.
Unequal application of the law is the real crime.
Trump acknowledged his womanizing and it was decades ago. Find me someone who hasn't sinned.
What this is really about, is the same thing it's always been about. Anything to disqualify Trump from running again and to destroy him so no one else will dare to "buck" the system of grift.
Bill or Hillary Clinton aren't getting arrested Tuesday as gar as I know, so this thread has nothing to do with them....or Hunter's laptop.
Also, Trump's alleged encounter with Stormy Daniels was described by her as "The worst 90 seconds of my life."
And that's coming from a porn actress/porn director/stripper with close to three decades in the smut business.
LOL@ Quick Draw McStraw-Head!!!
I guess you missed my point. It's about equal justice under the law. Is that just a thing of the past?
Witch nut, witch hunt, But Hillary, But Hillary, But Hunter, But Hunter !!! The battle cry of the the Defenders of a Seditious Traitor !!
Yeah, sure a witch hunt???
Bill and Hillary are just unjustly connected to over 80 people that died under mysterious circumstances. I didn't say hurt, beat up, abused, which are all wrong, I said DIED. I remember one poster on the conservative side pointing out a link to Snopes about a liberal and the most arrogant poster EVER on these boards laughed at Snopes. Then the same poster linked to Snopes claiming the body count was a right-wing conspiracy, so now Snopes is a reputable source? How's that work?
Anything that Trump did that was factually illegal and can be proven, then he should face the consequences. The same rules should apply to the Biden, Obama and Clinton Families, but they don't.
Please, take a seat now:
If Hunter Biden were Trump's son doing exactly 100% what Hunter has done, you left-wingers would be ALL over it day and night. But...you don't own anything, you just deflect and turn into crickets. Biden claiming to not know or have anything to do with his son's dealing? Yeah, ok. If Trump said the same thing, I'd respond the same way.
If Trump were accused of being connected to 6 people dying mysteriously ( ot over 80!) the MAIN liberals on this site would be posting it day after day and I'd do my own research and probably agree---that's the final straw, having someone killed to silence them ().
My link doesn't count, right? But if it were about Trump, then you're all happy lads, eh? I've seen that with the top 3 liberals on the Biden Thread. They know it, but they lie.
Boys on the Tracks ()? Mary Mahoney? If you can't explain it away, just call it a right wing conspiracy and don't say anything else.
The above is one of many reasons that there is very little civility in posts about Trump or Biden.
As for Rojo's post, call me wrong Rojo, and I may be, but I don't see Trump being arrested. I also didn't see Hillary Clinton getting arrested in the Winter of 2018 as my friend claimed who happens to be a far, far right-winger. He heard it from a YouTube channel called Q, which I've never seen. I told him "she's not getting arrested" and was told, you'll see.
There is no right or wrong anymore, it's just left-wing or right-wing, period. I don't care about upvotes or downvotes, does zero to my ego. This is just a minute forum with a couple dozen people commenting out of approximately 258 million 18 and over adults in this country. Go ahead, voice your opinion, but own the truth on both sides. Biden made some terrible decisions on his FIRST day in the office, but...but...but...but... Glass Houses.
None of this matters. Neither Clinton is getting arrested Tuesday. Neither is Hunter Biden or his laptop.
Funniest part is he's not getting arrested for anything illegal....until he made it that way by someone discovering the campaign fund distribution page and saw "Whore" listed with a 130K debit LOL
What a dummy
Hope the 90 seconds was worth it! Hahahahahahahaha