I like this post, but I don't think it should factor into anyone's conclusions unless it's verified that they actually ran for Soles. An anonymous post isn't credible evidence an article by an established publication. Although, if RunnersWorld or Stinger didn't verify/lied about stuff like freshman girls doing 19 miles on Mondays, I'm ready to write off the entire article and call for the author to be fired. With that said, I'd hope that RW/their authors/editors have enough journalistic integrity to make sure the scathing article they're writing is pretty much bulletproof, so I think it's a huge mistake to ignore the claims made in the article because of an anonymous messageboard poster. The article says they interviewed "Researchers, parents of athletes, a dozen running coaches, and nearly two dozen young women who participated in top high school running programs in the United States", so I'm erring of the side of them making a good faith effort to tell the truth.
I'm gonna make another post that's critical of the article, but since that post got a lot of upvotes I wanted to say this separately.