20 years ago today. Wejo 'escorted' Paula Radcliffe to her WR in Chicago.

Pro News/Info/Results Marathons
Reply
Moderation
1 2 3
Next
  • registered

    casual obsever

    Member since 11/19/2015.

    5,439 posts. Last post 1 year ago.
    1 year ago 10/15/2022 5:57am EDT
    re: ggfdggfdg

    ggfdggfdg wrote:

    likely doping says who? extract from The Guardian:

    The IAAF in 2012, as they wrote in their litte propaganda piece some five years ago:

    "Ms Radcliffe's (anonymised) profile was referred for independent expert review"

    That is only done after it is flagged as "likely doping".

    And yes, according to the IAAF, those experts didn't classify that as an "adverse passport finding", which of course doesn't mean much, as the cases of the EPO users Kiprop and Poistogova show.

    Interestingly, the IAAF also wrote that "Ms Radcliffe was target tested for rEPO on every occasion that the applicable IAAF regulations required". LOL

  • Hdhhe

    Anonymous Poster

    1 year ago 10/15/2022 6:04am EDT
    re: rojo

    So the sum of your evidence that she was likely doping amounts to 'she was tested more often than other athletes'?

  • registered

    casual obsever

    Member since 11/19/2015.

    5,439 posts. Last post 1 year ago.
    1 year ago 10/15/2022 6:31am EDT
    re: Hdhhe

    Hdhhe wrote:

    So the sum of your evidence that she was likely doping amounts to 'she was tested more often than other athletes'?

    No. Evidence (not proof) in brief:

    1) Off-score jump of 47% within a few days in 2003 (that the IAAF never explained).

    2) Off-score jump of 40% within a few days in 2005 (that the IAAF never explained).

    3) "likely doping" in 2012 ("Ms Radcliffe's (anonymised) profile was referred for independent expert review").

    That even the IAAF admittedly "target" tested her several times is just icing on the cake. They too saw something suspicious...

    Finally note that "likely doping" is the official wording from IAAF, not mine. See also their leaked 2016 list.

  • Hdhhe

    Anonymous Poster

    1 year ago 10/15/2022 8:58am EDT
    re: casual obsever

    Can you show me where the iaaf said likely doping?

  • registered

    casual obsever

    Member since 11/19/2015.

    5,439 posts. Last post 1 year ago.
    1 year ago 10/15/2022 10:13am EDT
    re: Hdhhe

    Again, last try:

    1) The IAAF sent her case to "independent expert review". Note the plural "the experts noted..."

    2) The ABP guidelines state under C.1.3:

    a) The review begins with the application of the Adaptive Model.
    b) In case of an Atypical Passport Finding or when the Athlete Passport Management Unit considers that a review is otherwise justified, an Expert conducts an initial review and returns an evaluation based on the information available at that time.
    c) In case of a “Likely doping” initial review, the Passport is then subjected to a review by three (3) Experts including the Expert who conducted the initial review.

    From the IAAF statement that her case was reviewed by expertS, you can deduce that the first Expert (point b) found her to be "likely doping", because only then expertS go for the review (point c).

    From the same ABP guideline document:

    Similarly, where the Expert is of the view that a Passport is likely the result of the Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method, it is necessary for a “Likely doping” evaluation that the Expert consider that it is highly unlikely that it may be the result of a normal physiological or pathological condition.]
1 2 3
Next Last
New Forum Moderation Information & Rules Search Troubleshooting

This thread has already been deleted.

Note: We review 100% of reports submitted. Visit our moderation dashboard to view statistics on our moderating activity. If you have a question or concern, email us at letsrun@letsrun.com or call us at our toll-free phone number:

1-844-LETSRUN (1-844-538-7786).

Author
Body
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?

View our Terms Of Service for a complete description of our forum policies.

Provide context for this post report if relevant.

Reply Replying to

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview
By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Message Board