fellowhoosier wrote:
Interesting tweet from Huntington’s head track coach/former interim XC coach. Tbf, it could not be related to Woods’ article about HU.
My post indicating Wiley had retweeted it was “deleted as factually incorrect.” It is not I correct. Here is Wiley’s Twitter profile. It’s there.
I wondered why your reply was deleted. After you posted it, I went to looked and saw that she had retweeted it.
ForFusion wrote:
Also, looks like another extension was granted. Nick/Lauren/Curtis have till the 8th to respond (if I'm reading this correct).
Discovery
To begin preparing for trial, both sides engage in discovery . This is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties about the witnesses and evidence they'll present at trial.
Discovery enables the parties to know before the trial begins what evidence may be presented. It s designed to prevent "trial by ambush," where one side doesn't learn of the other side s evidence or witnesses until the trial, when there s no time to obtain answering evidence.
They are waiting to determine what evidence can be admissible to the case pending whether or not Huntington's motion to dismiss is approved or rejected by the Judge. Which I believe Huntington said they never received a formal Title IX complaint so there is no grounds for the case.
There is not note on when the determination on motion to dismiss will be decided. If it is not accepted by the court. they will then address discovery.
This post was removed.
Big update. New criminal indictment:
Glad he'll get his day in court. If half of what I've read about him is true, I hope he serves the maximum 30 months.
Glad he’ll be getting his day in court. So just to clarify, there’s only one actual lawsuit which was brought forward by Stoffel? The other allegations (i.e. the doping stuff, additional rape victims, etc.) is separate and as far as we know there is no ongoing criminal investigation regarding those matters.
Just want to make sure my understanding is correct.
ForFusion wrote:
Glad he’ll be getting his day in court. So just to clarify, there’s only one actual lawsuit which was brought forward by Stoffel? The other allegations (i.e. the doping stuff, additional rape victims, etc.) is separate and as far as we know there is no ongoing criminal investigation regarding those matters.
Just want to make sure my understanding is correct.
We’ve been discussing the civil case (group of plaintiffs vs johnsons, hines, HU) for this thread. I believe that is still in process as there has been no notice that they have approved HU’s motion to dismiss the university as a defendant or dismiss claims.
this is a suit of criminal charges against johnson.
which is important because it means the evidence was strong enough for the county prosecutor to feel it should be taken to court. Higher threshold to be found guilty.
assuming after review of the information in the civil case, the county decided to get involved for a criminal case.
ForFusion wrote:
Glad he’ll be getting his day in court. So just to clarify, there’s only one actual lawsuit which was brought forward by Stoffel? The other allegations (i.e. the doping stuff, additional rape victims, etc.) is separate and as far as we know there is no ongoing criminal investigation regarding those matters.
Just want to make sure my understanding is correct.
This is a new criminal case where it’s the state vs Nick and the issue is his sexual assault of Stoeffel but Nick.
All other issues are part of the separate civil suit and there isn’t any public info I’m aware of indicating there is any criminal investigation currently underway.
This post was removed.
This quoted post has been removed.
The new coach(s) are cowards.
What they are saying about Johnson:
They also own a track and cross country course so I'm sure that makes their decision harder. My ex-girlfriend's school cut their men's running programs but they didn't have money tied into the facilities like HU does.
Must be the same people that run the Indiana Runner website that keep pulling down comments. A few Indiana coach from a northern Indiana coach and the Carmel coach are sensoring comments due to supporting this university.
One of the moderators of the Indiana Runner website is close friends with Curtis Hines. Read into that what you will.
trojandc04 wrote:
One of the moderators of the Indiana Runner website is close friends with Curtis Hines. Read into that what you will.
Probably why I just got banned for calling them out on that site.
One of the mods on Indiana Runner also accused people of gossiping on a thread back in August of this year, which was after Nick had already been sentenced the first time. He later deleted the comment.
I remember
Hearing today. Nick's defense trying to get the venue changed. I believe this is usually done because the defense believes a jury selected from locals will be biased against the defendant.
