You are like the blind man from the '60s telling the modern 20-20 vision man what he sees based on what he thought he heard.
One pillar of science and application of its methods is to ignore what athletes and coaches and anti-doping experts say, and instead, follow their data. Where would we be today, if Einstein hadn't ignored Newton, and hadn't followed the data?
Contrary to your perception, and my repeated corrections, my narrative accepts that doping is wide spread, and examples can be found at the "top", because the belief in doping is wide, and deep, and even goes to the top.
The part you consistently fail to address is how that impacts the fastest performances -- if at all.