80 yr old banned from YMCA pool for life for telling person with penis to get out of women's showers & not stare at girls

RunRagged wrote:

huhuh wrote:

So you are denying the existence of transwomen and their identity. You probably say silly things like just because I feel like a cat doesn’t make me a cat. Well, don’t worry, nobody in power actually gives any ear to washed up sad sacks like you. That includes WA and CAS, most other sports’ governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments and practically all western ones.

So you are denying the existence of transwomen and their identity

No one is "denying the existence of transwomen and their identity." TW are all over the place, and many of them are in positions of enormous prominence and power, and they are very vocal and aggressive in demanding attention and their supposed rights. So only idiots who are totally out of touch would "deny their existence."

What many people are calling into question is the contention/belief that the identity of TW matters more than their sex.

nobody in power actually gives any ear to washed up sad sacks like you.That includes WA and CAS, most other sports’ governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments and practically all western ones.

Are you seriously claiming that "people in power, sports governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments" are automatically in the right?

Is it really your position that that anyone who questions the orthodox, authoritarian positions espoused and imposed on the public by "government authorities and big corporations with wealth and power" must all be "washed up sad sacks" whose views don't deserve a hearing?

What ever happened to "question authority," "fight the power,""stick it to the man" and "believe her"?

Regarding WA and the CAS specifically: I think your view that the gender identity claims made by some males should take precedence over their biological sex - and that males should be able to use gender identity claims to muscle in on female sports, spaces and services - is what's "washed up" and out of touch. Just look at what's been going on of late in the UK.

huhuh wrote:

RunRagged wrote:

So you are denying the existence of transwomen and their identity

No one is "denying the existence of transwomen and their identity." TW are all over the place, and many of them are in positions of enormous prominence and power, and they are very vocal and aggressive in demanding attention and their supposed rights. So only idiots who are totally out of touch would "deny their existence."

What many people are calling into question is the contention/belief that the identity of TW matters more than their sex.

nobody in power actually gives any ear to washed up sad sacks like you.That includes WA and CAS, most other sports’ governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments and practically all western ones.

Are you seriously claiming that "people in power, sports governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments" are automatically in the right?

Is it really your position that that anyone who questions the orthodox, authoritarian positions espoused and imposed on the public by "government authorities and big corporations with wealth and power" must all be "washed up sad sacks" whose views don't deserve a hearing?

What ever happened to "question authority," "fight the power,""stick it to the man" and "believe her"?

Regarding WA and the CAS specifically: I think your view that the gender identity claims made by some males should take precedence over their biological sex - and that males should be able to use gender identity claims to muscle in on female sports, spaces and services - is what's "washed up" and out of touch. Just look at what's been going on of late in the UK.

Look at the attention-starved transphobic troglodyte inserting her predictably verbose clit into a conversation where no one was even talking to her.

huhuh wrote:

RunRagged wrote:

So you are denying the existence of transwomen and their identity

No one is "denying the existence of transwomen and their identity." TW are all over the place, and many of them are in positions of enormous prominence and power, and they are very vocal and aggressive in demanding attention and their supposed rights. So only idiots who are totally out of touch would "deny their existence."

What many people are calling into question is the contention/belief that the identity of TW matters more than their sex.

nobody in power actually gives any ear to washed up sad sacks like you.That includes WA and CAS, most other sports’ governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments and practically all western ones.

Are you seriously claiming that "people in power, sports governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments" are automatically in the right?

Is it really your position that that anyone who questions the orthodox, authoritarian positions espoused and imposed on the public by "government authorities and big corporations with wealth and power" must all be "washed up sad sacks" whose views don't deserve a hearing?

What ever happened to "question authority," "fight the power,""stick it to the man" and "believe her"?

Regarding WA and the CAS specifically: I think your view that the gender identity claims made by some males should take precedence over their biological sex - and that males should be able to use gender identity claims to muscle in on female sports, spaces and services - is what's "washed up" and out of touch. Just look at what's been going on of late in the UK.

Look at the attention-starved transphobic troglodyte inserting her predictably verbose clit into a conversation where no one was even talking to her.

huhuh wrote:

RunRagged wrote:

So you are denying the existence of transwomen and their identity

No one is "denying the existence of transwomen and their identity." TW are all over the place, and many of them are in positions of enormous prominence and power, and they are very vocal and aggressive in demanding attention and their supposed rights. So only idiots who are totally out of touch would "deny their existence."

What many people are calling into question is the contention/belief that the identity of TW matters more than their sex.

nobody in power actually gives any ear to washed up sad sacks like you.That includes WA and CAS, most other sports’ governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments and practically all western ones.

Are you seriously claiming that "people in power, sports governing bodies, most big corporations with wealth and power, and most governments" are automatically in the right?

Is it really your position that that anyone who questions the orthodox, authoritarian positions espoused and imposed on the public by "government authorities and big corporations with wealth and power" must all be "washed up sad sacks" whose views don't deserve a hearing?

What ever happened to "question authority," "fight the power,""stick it to the man" and "believe her"?

Regarding WA and the CAS specifically: I think your view that the gender identity claims made by some males should take precedence over their biological sex - and that males should be able to use gender identity claims to muscle in on female sports, spaces and services - is what's "washed up" and out of touch. Just look at what's been going on of late in the UK.

Look at the attention-starved transphobic troglodyte inserting her predictably verbose clit into a conversation where no one was even talking to her.