Find a new interest so you can hate that when it evolves and adapts to new technology too
Find a new interest so you can hate that when it evolves and adapts to new technology too
I wonder if it will surpass Seoul '88 as "the dirtiest race in history"?
Probably not, as it was a national event.
In any case, Kerley now belongs into the illustrious sub-9.8 club:
9.58 Bolt (doped teammate, Jamaican clen scandal, DQ’d in 4x 100 relay in Beijing)
9.69 Blake - doped
9.69 Gay - doped
9.72 Powell - doped
9.74 Gatlin – doped
9.76 Coleman (3 whereabout failures in 12 months, banned)
9.76 Kerley
9.77 Bromell - doped teammate
9.78 Carter - doped
9.78 (DQ) Montgomery - doped
9.79 (DQ) Johnson - doped
9.79 Greene - doped
casual obsever wrote:
Probably not, as it was a national event.
In any case, Kerley now belongs into the illustrious sub-9.8 club:
9.58 Bolt (doped teammate, Jamaican clen scandal, DQ’d in 4x 100 relay in Beijing)
9.69 Blake - doped
9.69 Gay - doped
9.72 Powell - doped
9.74 Gatlin – doped
9.76 Coleman (3 whereabout failures in 12 months, banned)
9.76 Kerley
9.77 Bromell - doped teammate
9.78 Carter - doped
9.78 (DQ) Montgomery - doped
9.79 (DQ) Johnson - doped
9.79 Greene - doped
Begs the question...is Kerley the fastest clean sprinter to ever do it? (Assuming Bolt and Coleman are dirty and Kerley's clean) The guy who everyone laughed at for ditching the 400?
kerley977 wrote:
Only reason everyone went under 10 is because Coleman pulled out. If Coleman ran he would've ran 10.12
Plus, the wind and track were ridiculous
"Would have ran" is never, ever correct in any usage.
Run
Ran
Have run
I will give you credit, though, for not saying "would of" like some of the idiots I see on here.