It is fascinating and frankly shocking that a sitting president could gather a group of corrupt and morally bankrupt people just like himself that were ready, willing and able to do anything to overturn the election regardless of oaths to the constitution. I am confident that this story is far from being completely written. The DOJ has much more than the committee and I think the Mar A Lago documents are also intertwined in Trumps criminality and treasonous disregard to the constitution. They weren't just souvenirs he wanted.
As I said on that day, Trump should have been marched out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave in handcuffs and left in a jail cell until this all could be figured out and then left their permanently once it was.
Crypto guy was fetched by guys with guns within weeks (days?). Trump’s still hanging out in FL over 2 years after trying to become king.
F**** up country.
Drives me crazy when journalists and others worry about punishment looking partisan. First off, he’s been treated with the softest kid gloves of all time. Truly obscene softness. Second, the ONLY alternative is establishing that the most powerful person in the world will be above the law.
I highly recommend you read the executive summary section Big Lie. If you thought you had a good understanding of Trumps Narcissistic insanity and deceit previously you will be rudely shocked further. Focus in on the table where Trump was told his election fraud conspiracy were false by his experts then days later told the country they were true.
it still blows my mind that idiots elected him.
You voted for Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton. lol...
Be sure to let Massie know that it's available so he can never read it.
So Epps was just a typical Trumper cult member. And the Trump cult chewed him up and spit him out to protect the dear leader.
I'm sure adult, Disco, and Carmine will rush in now to correct the previous misinformation they were spreading.
I doubt it. Carmine has vowed in this thread to never read the January 6th Report, so it's unlikely he would read any of the underlying testimony. The other two you mention don't have any real interest in Epps or the attention span for anything other than a Tweet on the subject.
Those who do read the Epps transcript will realize that Epps sure wasn't the brightest guy in the world, but he was an absolute Trump idealist. He believed. He did not deserve to get tossed under the bus by Massie, Gaetz and Greene-Taylor the way he did. The fact that Massie is still trying to sacrifice Epps' career, business and life just to preserve Trump's image is really disgusting.
He only cited speech and debate clause to give him cover with M*AGA and be forced to testify. This is why Trump is choosing to attack Jack Smith just last night. Trump is a scourge and going down.
He only cited speech and debate clause to give him cover with M*AGA and be forced to testify. This is why Trump is choosing to attack Jack Smith just last night. Trump is a scourge and going down.
Speaking of testimony -- is Alex Jones producer Owen Shroyer now testifying to seditious conspiracy that went down at the Willard Hotel? Rudy, Bannon, Stone, Flynn, Meadows? Lock them Up.
Raskin is anti-democracy and an election denier: "Yet television audiences may remember him as the man who showed up on CNN to recommend dismantling the Electoral College after the 2000 election didn’t turn out the way he wanted."
Having our president elected by national popular vote sounds much more democratic than the mish-mash mess Electoral College system that we currently have. So I would mark Jamie Raskin as definitely pro-democracy.
Wyoming voter weight, in the EC system, is 3.6 times higher than a California voter. Republicans like that because it gives them some hope in national elections, even though they get smoked in the popular vote.
If Republicans were winning the popular vote in a run away but losing because of the EC, they would be SCREAMING to change it.
We know that is true, just like we know how they would react if Obama had a mountain of classified documents in his shower (after claiming he gave them all back) or how they would react if Justice Sotomayor was being flown around the world by George Soros, or if he bought her mom's house or put her kids through a boarding school, etc.
Republicans have lost all credibility and Lisa Murkowski admits it. “I’m having more ‘rational Republicans’ coming up to me and saying, ‘I just don’t know how long I can stay in this party,’” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). “Now our party is becoming known as a group of kind of extremist, populist over-the-top [people] where no one is taking us seriously anymore.”
For Trump to win in 2024 he only needs some 250K in 4 states to switch from their vote for Biden to him and he would win the EC. Even though he could be obliterated again in the popular vote. The GOP can't win a popular vote because their positions are unpopular. And people hate them more and more with recent policies. So they must gerrymander and try to stop ethnics from voting.
Now do you see why the GOP is creating "no labels" and Bannon is funding RFK Jr? Do you see why Trump is desperate to get his trials pushed to after the election?
Stay tuned though. Jack Smith may be indicting Trump and his team for schemes to intimidate minority voters from voting in 2020. That is why he has subpoena video of these facilities. Pay close attention to the reports that Trump may be indicted for:
"conspiracy to commit an offense or to defraud the U.S., and deprivation of rights under color of law".
Having our president elected by national popular vote sounds much more democratic than the mish-mash mess Electoral College system that we currently have. So I would mark Jamie Raskin as definitely pro-democracy.
The Founders would disagree with you. You want to change the rules because the rules we have had for 250 years have not been favorable for you. You are a poor loser.
Having our president elected by national popular vote sounds much more democratic than the mish-mash mess Electoral College system that we currently have. So I would mark Jamie Raskin as definitely pro-democracy.
The Founders would disagree with you. You want to change the rules because the rules we have had for 250 years have not been favorable for you. You are a poor loser.