I'll just point out, as an alternative view for those watching on, that most people with an interest in military aviation accept without question that all sightings of 'UFO's are, in fact, clandestine military aircraft.
The rule of thumb is that whatever you see flying now, is some 20-30 years behind the curve.
There is nothing interesting about area 51, except the fact that it is home to Lockheed's Skunk Works. They managed to not only produce and test the F-117 Nighthawk, but field it operationally before the general public had any idea it even existed.
It's interesting, then, that talk of UFOs tends to center around area 51.
A nice piece of circumstantial evidence is that UFO mania began in the '50s, which was right around when prototypes of the first generation of post-WWII next-generation aircraft would have been conducting initial tests.
That's the narrative that the liberal media and the military industrial complex wants you to believe.
Fauci invested in the lab that created UFO cover-ups. But you won't see this on MSNBC.
Sorry, i know everything in america has to fall along partisan lines, but i have no idea what that means in regard to UFOs.
Let me guess, Republicans will want to build a space shield to keep alien immigrants out and the alien governments will pay for it. Democrats want open border and to make alien immigrants US citizens immediately so they can vote out the rest of the republicans. Typical.
Wrong. Republicans will want to invest money into research and exploration of space. Democrats will say that we should instead spend that money on killing fetuses.
First page, and the 105 iq reddit crowd and braindead Republican "what are they trying to distract us from" crowds are already here!
Yes, they're DEFINITELY trying to distract you with UFOs, why else would they have ran a black-budget program studying them for two decades without telling the public, before they fired the director, leading to the leaks and common knowledge we have today? Why else would the UFO committee meetings be in the footnotes of government websites?
It's like all critical thinking skills in this country are gone. Go watch the videos of these objects and listen to the pilots talk about them. They aren't of this world.
LOVE this!
1) there's a massive secret conspiracy, research program and budget
2) it's been busted wide open by a couple of videos and a disgruntled ex-employee.
If there was a massive secret conspiracy, they'd be leaking the right things at the right time to suit their aims.
On critical thinking skills, are you saying that these things have bent and broken the laws of physics or have been travelling for decades, centuries or millennia at or near the speed of light to rock up on our little planet, hidden away in a pretty unremarkable galaxy, just to play hide and seek?
First page, and the 105 iq reddit crowd and braindead Republican "what are they trying to distract us from" crowds are already here!
Yes, they're DEFINITELY trying to distract you with UFOs, why else would they have ran a black-budget program studying them for two decades without telling the public, before they fired the director, leading to the leaks and common knowledge we have today? Why else would the UFO committee meetings be in the footnotes of government websites?
It's like all critical thinking skills in this country are gone. Go watch the videos of these objects and listen to the pilots talk about them. They aren't of this world.
LOVE this!
1) there's a massive secret conspiracy, research program and budget
2) it's been busted wide open by a couple of videos and a disgruntled ex-employee.
If there was a massive secret conspiracy, they'd be leaking the right things at the right time to suit their aims.
On critical thinking skills, are you saying that these things have bent and broken the laws of physics or have been travelling for decades, centuries or millennia at or near the speed of light to rock up on our little planet, hidden away in a pretty unremarkable galaxy, just to play hide and seek?
I'll just point out, as an alternative view for those watching on, that most people with an interest in military aviation accept without question that all sightings of 'UFO's are, in fact, clandestine military aircraft.
The rule of thumb is that whatever you see flying now, is some 20-30 years behind the curve.
But these UFO's are not even remotely possible with known technology
This should be MASSIVE news
Unfortunately any serious UFO conversation is crowded out by the 105 IQ reddit brigade trying to "debunk" everything
The "Gimbal" UFO is the poster child of modern UFO videos. Leaked in 2017, and officially released in 2019, it's considered by many to show a genuine anomalo...
I also have absolutely no idea what this is supposed to mean.
I'm guessing the party associated with the portly real estate guy will take the pro UFO side.
See, given that party's proclivity for believing conspiracy theories, I would normally agree with you, but we have to remember that this party also caters to the fundamentalist Christian crowd. The existence of UFOs and lifeforms from places other than earth isn't in the Bible, therefore it threatens their concept of an all-seeing, all-knowing, all-planning creator.
I'm guessing the party associated with the portly real estate guy will take the pro UFO side.
See, given that party's proclivity for believing conspiracy theories, I would normally agree with you, but we have to remember that this party also caters to the fundamentalist Christian crowd. The existence of UFOs and lifeforms from places other than earth isn't in the Bible, therefore it threatens their concept of an all-seeing, all-knowing, all-planning creator.
I’m waiting for the explanation that the aliens are angels that were murdered by libs and it’s a liberal conspiracy to cover up the existence of angels because libs hate god, blah blah blah…
It's just camera artifacts, radar malfunctions, and tired pilots getting confused.
UFOs travel across the galaxy and decide only to mess with Navy pilots in specific locations. Ok, sure.
Lots of ppl have seen UFO's but we understandably are going to focus on what US Navy pilots have seen, not some farmer in Argentina
Yes, and all of the prior sightings have been dismissed immediately as camera artifacts, tired/altered-state-of-mind observers, or just fraud.
I don't really see the difference here, except I highly doubt that the airmen are just making stuff up for the heck of it.
UFOs fly across the galaxy but only make themselves visible to select Naval aviators and/or civilians with extreme fatigue, drugs, or crappy camera equipment.
I'll just point out, as an alternative view for those watching on, that most people with an interest in military aviation accept without question that all sightings of 'UFO's are, in fact, clandestine military aircraft.
The rule of thumb is that whatever you see flying now, is some 20-30 years behind the curve.
There is nothing interesting about area 51, except the fact that it is home to Lockheed's Skunk Works. They managed to not only produce and test the F-117 Nighthawk, but field it operationally before the general public had any idea it even existed.
It's interesting, then, that talk of UFOs tends to center around area 51.
A nice piece of circumstantial evidence is that UFO mania began in the '50s, which was right around when prototypes of the first generation of post-WWII next-generation aircraft would have been conducting initial tests.
A few things: Skunkworks is in Palmdale, not 51. SW is definitely NOT based at Groom Lake. You’re correct regarding the first post war prototypes, but the SR 71 blackbird is actually what that division of Lockheed is known for- not those original prototypes. The SR-71 having much of its testing at Groom Lake. Another note is that Roswell was in the 40’s, with documented aerial phenomena LONG before that. There is a documented crash even in the late 1800’s (Texas?). 51 is associated with uap’s in pop culture (largely due to George Knapp’s expose with Bob Lazar) due to military prototype testing of both reverse engineered as well as actual off world craft are tested/flown, whereas Wright-Patterson AFB is actually the place where most of the recovered crashes are taken and analyzed. Further, UAP tech and associated interest (governmental) has led to extensive studies that fishtail into other anomalies such as abductions, wormholes, antigravity applications, invisibility cloaking, and fusion technology. Most new testing of off world vehicles as well as reverse engineered tech is now done at Dugway Proving Grounds, west of Salt Lake City. You don’t have to believe me, but the above is fairly well known in the appropriate circles, especially with those interested in new tech involving military aviation.
I'll just point out, as an alternative view for those watching on, that most people with an interest in military aviation accept without question that all sightings of 'UFO's are, in fact, clandestine military aircraft.
The rule of thumb is that whatever you see flying now, is some 20-30 years behind the curve.
There is nothing interesting about area 51, except the fact that it is home to Lockheed's Skunk Works. They managed to not only produce and test the F-117 Nighthawk, but field it operationally before the general public had any idea it even existed.
It's interesting, then, that talk of UFOs tends to center around area 51.
A nice piece of circumstantial evidence is that UFO mania began in the '50s, which was right around when prototypes of the first generation of post-WWII next-generation aircraft would have been conducting initial tests.
A few things: Skunkworks is in Palmdale, not 51. SW is definitely NOT based at Groom Lake. You’re correct regarding the first post war prototypes, but the SR 71 blackbird is actually what that division of Lockheed is known for- not those original prototypes. The SR-71 having much of its testing at Groom Lake. Another note is that Roswell was in the 40’s, with documented aerial phenomena LONG before that. There is a documented crash even in the late 1800’s (Texas?). 51 is associated with uap’s in pop culture (largely due to George Knapp’s expose with Bob Lazar) due to military prototype testing of both reverse engineered as well as actual off world craft are tested/flown, whereas Wright-Patterson AFB is actually the place where most of the recovered crashes are taken and analyzed. Further, UAP tech and associated interest (governmental) has led to extensive studies that fishtail into other anomalies such as abductions, wormholes, antigravity applications, invisibility cloaking, and fusion technology. Most new testing of off world vehicles as well as reverse engineered tech is now done at Dugway Proving Grounds, west of Salt Lake City. You don’t have to believe me, but the above is fairly well known in the appropriate circles, especially with those interested in new tech involving military aviation.
Oh yeah, the US military has fusion power and antigravity from aliens but is keeping it hidden... because??
Trump was given access to Area 51 , and he told some of PGA tour players that the aliens had transparent skin, and freezing them in a cryo chamber disintegrated there little bodies . For a reference the aliens were the about the size of Little Wayne .
Lots of ppl have seen UFO's but we understandably are going to focus on what US Navy pilots have seen, not some farmer in Argentina
Yes, and all of the prior sightings have been dismissed immediately as camera artifacts, tired/altered-state-of-mind observers, or just fraud.
I don't really see the difference here, except I highly doubt that the airmen are just making stuff up for the heck of it.
UFOs fly across the galaxy but only make themselves visible to select Naval aviators and/or civilians with extreme fatigue, drugs, or crappy camera equipment.
MOST UFO sightings can't be proven or disproven either way. We just assume most are fake because that's overwhelmingly likely for MOST cases.
If some UFOs are real, they don't ONLY visit Naval aviators. Those are just the cases we have the potentially reliable information to look into.
Yes, and all of the prior sightings have been dismissed immediately as camera artifacts, tired/altered-state-of-mind observers, or just fraud.
I don't really see the difference here, except I highly doubt that the airmen are just making stuff up for the heck of it.
UFOs fly across the galaxy but only make themselves visible to select Naval aviators and/or civilians with extreme fatigue, drugs, or crappy camera equipment.
MOST UFO sightings can't be proven or disproven either way. We just assume most are fake because that's overwhelmingly likely for MOST cases.
If some UFOs are real, they don't ONLY visit Naval aviators. Those are just the cases we have the potentially reliable information to look into.
Alternatively, we give more credence to camera artifacts and the memories of tired humans because they are naval aviators.
Most cameras are garbage for trying to record something like a UFO. It's not like everyone is sitting around with a 1200mm f/0.95 lens in the middle of the night with a camera capable of not only focusing and actually making a decent exposure. Cell phone cameras are absolutely atrocious in low light and fast motion settings.
The aliens came to help Russia, which by their advanced knowledge is the best country. The US found out in 1947 and has been trying to destroy Russia ever since. Russia and the aliens will win.
