Disinformation Governance Board?!? Wait what??? Biden is going to openly admit that not only the truth needs to be squashed, but let's openly violate free speech? Tell me this is a joke?
Lol some libs aren't even pretending that they value free speech anymore. The most radical have started to say that free speech is bad because it might hurt "disadvantaged minorities", etc.
Disinformation Governance Board?!? Wait what??? Biden is going to openly admit that not only the truth needs to be squashed, but let's openly violate free speech? Tell me this is a joke?
Lol some libs aren't even pretending that they value free speech anymore. The most radical have started to say that free speech is bad because it might hurt "disadvantaged minorities", etc.
This is nearly as laughable as the GQP giving up on the truth and reality.
Left and right, they both censor and both lie to further their interests. There is more nuance to life than "my party is 100% right and your party is 100% wrong".
This is the answer.
When both sides constantly make claims that the other side is corrupt and in the wrong, you’ve gotta believe both are at least partially in the wrong.
I think a lot of people don’t realize that right and leftist ideologies often have good intentions, but the actual politicians warp those intentions for their own political/financial gain.
Biden is borderline if not already unfit for service. I can’t get behind the whole Biden laptop thing, because Joe isn’t Hunter. That being said, it’s clear he’s not putting forth an effort to fulfill a lot of campaign promises and that’s where he loses my respect.
Trump is a raging narcissist. Conservatives constantly cry about fake news, false statistics, and media bias, but have no problem eating up all of fox news’ claims saying Trump is a hero and statistically the best president in decades.
The problem isn’t the dems or reps, it’s the establishment. You will not win an election unless you are filthy rich, funded by someone who is filthy rich, or funded by a foreign country or corporation. This is a perfect recipe for corruption on both sides. Just because one side tells you what you like to hear, doesn’t mean they aren’t corrupt/lying to you.
The "story" was that it was fake Russian disinformation.
Why are you always so dishonest?
Was it? Sounds like plenty of new sources were reporting multiple opinions about it. You clearly were able to find information that fit your political dogmas.
Sorry guys, a news story that was front page for days is a terrible example. Do better with your pearl clutching.
Find me examples of left-leaning media or supposedly "neutral" media outlets that were saying it was a legitimate story rather than "Russian disinformation". I'll be waiting.
The NY Post ran the story, and right leaning news outlets covered the story. For the rest of the nation, it was just a story about how Russia was trying to interfere with the elections again and that we shouldn't believe it.
In fact, on social media whenever it was discussed, either the post was tagged with a "fact-check" saying it was disinformation, or the user was banned. That's how bad it was, and why this is such a big deal.
You seriously are going to cry election interference for some article not getting tweeted even though the article was still available and easy to find, while Republicans in large have systematically suppressed voting in many states and tried to overthrow an election? (BTW, I'm a Republican)
It's the same mis proportion of outrage over Hunter making 2-3M sitting on some boards while giving Jarred a pass for $1B that doesn't make sense to me. And Jarred is just the tip of the iceberg of the amount of corruption and duplicity from those in the Trump administration. The best way to deflect blame is to blame someone else, it seems to work.
People should be outraged by corruption on both sides as well as attempts to diminish or silence the voice of opposition. Instead, they either point fingers at eachother or ignore it and say it doesn't matter.
I am. That was my point. But we should be at least 500x more outraged at Jarred than Hunter, if my math is right. And within Trumps orbit there are probably another 20 to more outraged about than Hunter. AND be outraged about Hunter.
Someone came back and said everybody knows about Jarred and his deal with the crown prince. I don't think that's true at all. Everybody knows about Hunter because its a talking point by the conservatives to counter their own corruption. And they are better in getting that message out.
The general public needs to start catching on to the reality that the left censors truths and people that run contrary to their agenda. Communist Russia and Chinese media employs the same tactics. The control of "information" is their dirty game. It's time to wake up.
Was it? Sounds like plenty of new sources were reporting multiple opinions about it. You clearly were able to find information that fit your political dogmas.
Sorry guys, a news story that was front page for days is a terrible example. Do better with your pearl clutching.
Find me examples of left-leaning media or supposedly "neutral" media outlets that were saying it was a legitimate story rather than "Russian disinformation". I'll be waiting.
The NY Post ran the story, and right leaning news outlets covered the story. For the rest of the nation, it was just a story about how Russia was trying to interfere with the elections again and that we shouldn't believe it.
In fact, on social media whenever it was discussed, either the post was tagged with a "fact-check" saying it was disinformation, or the user was banned. That's how bad it was, and why this is such a big deal.
bro, no need to admit you still post on Facebook. There’s your problem
I am. That was my point. But we should be at least 500x more outraged at Jarred than Hunter, if my math is right. And within Trumps orbit there are probably another 20 to more outraged about than Hunter. AND be outraged about Hunter.
Someone came back and said everybody knows about Jarred and his deal with the crown prince. I don't think that's true at all. Everybody knows about Hunter because its a talking point by the conservatives to counter their own corruption. And they are better in getting that message out.
Jarrod was negotiating peace in the middle east. Hunter Biden was raising money for more drugs and strippers.
That's why I'm more okay with Jarrod. I am a staunch supporter of PEACE.
Find me examples of left-leaning media or supposedly "neutral" media outlets that were saying it was a legitimate story rather than "Russian disinformation". I'll be waiting.
The NY Post ran the story, and right leaning news outlets covered the story. For the rest of the nation, it was just a story about how Russia was trying to interfere with the elections again and that we shouldn't believe it.
In fact, on social media whenever it was discussed, either the post was tagged with a "fact-check" saying it was disinformation, or the user was banned. That's how bad it was, and why this is such a big deal.
bro, no need to admit you still post on Facebook. There’s your problem
bro, no need to admit you still post on Facebook. There’s your problem
Did you find any?
Sure, even Facebook removed their 'fact checking' after a week or something. I see nothing wrong with outlets flagging an unverified article as dubious until it is better verified. Sounds like responsible journalism to me.
You're just mad that people didn't take the bait, because the parts of the story that were true were pretty boring.
Sure, even Facebook removed their 'fact checking' after a week or something. I see nothing wrong with outlets flagging an unverified article as dubious until it is better verified. Sounds like responsible journalism to me.
You're just mad that people didn't take the bait, because the parts of the story that were true were pretty boring.
2 years later you have absolutely no idea what's on the laptop... and you're arguing that the story was played out...
This would be funny if there weren't millions of equally ignorant people voting...