Carhatt, clothing maker for America’s underclasses, maintains their vaccination requirement despite no legal obligation. Will their vax-adverse (read: poor, stupid) clientele boycott? Can they afford to?
Carhatt, clothing maker for America’s underclasses, maintains their vaccination requirement despite no legal obligation. Will their vax-adverse (read: poor, stupid) clientele boycott? Can they afford to?
I love my Carhartt clothes. I just had a work jacked of them on.
Yeah for them.
As a member of the sufficiently-educated elite (I finished high school) I was unaware the company is actually know as “Carhartt.”
Proceed accordingly
Vaxxedandmasked wrote:
I love my Carhartt clothes. I just had a work jacked of them on.
Yeah for them.
As a fellow vax-enjoyer I respect your opinions. I will look into “Carhartt” for my next clothing purchase!
I have a dark grey Carhartt Rain Defender hooded sweatshirt I wear to bed. Great sweatshirt to get the mail when cold out. My girlfriend wears it and only it sometimes.
They face a tough choice. Carhartt is fine quality stuff at a premium price. They could save money buying Dickie's but, most anti-vaxxers would be afraid that having "Dickie's" on their clothes might make them gay.
They should pray on it.
owning the libs?? wrote:
Carhatt, clothing maker for America’s underclasses, maintains their vaccination requirement despite no legal obligation. Will their vax-adverse (read: poor, stupid) clientele boycott? Can they afford to?
Most anti-vaxxers just want the ability to make their own decision without big government interference, mandates and lockdowns. Carhartt* as a company has chosen to make their own decision. An anti-vaxxers might not agree with that decision. They may respect that the company was able to make their own choice without a forced government mandate.
This vaccine has already been proven to not actually prevent the infection, not be as effective as originally advertised, and not last as long as originally believed. Carhartt has proven to make quality, affordable work gear for hard working Americans for many years.
Head back to the ski slopes in your overpriced winter wear you submissive lib.
owning the libs?? wrote:
Carhatt, clothing maker for America’s underclasses, maintains their vaccination requirement despite no legal obligation. Will their vax-adverse (read: poor, stupid) clientele boycott? Can they afford to?
I am neither poor nor stupid, yet the COVID vaccine mandate is BS and the people like who you demonize anyone that doesn't go along are the real problem. I'll bet you aren't out there championing every other thing that could "save the life of some stranger", just what the media tells you to champion, right?
Ask yourself, what else are you doing to help humanity? Are you constantly trying to get cigarettes banned? Are you perhaps feeding and clothing the homeless daily? Are you raising money to pay for other medication that insurance companies won't pay for, thereby causing those poor people to remain sick or even die? How about the regular flu, known more formally as influenza. Do you think we should all be forced into those flu shots too? How many decades of flu shots and they do nothing for the most part.
The folks questioning the mandates aren't your enemy. The very act of questioning should be a good thing, otherwise we have sheep. If the government says its good for you, you should 100% question the validity of it.
I'll Take This One... wrote:
They face a tough choice. Carhartt is fine quality stuff at a premium price. They could save money buying Dickie's but, most anti-vaxxers would be afraid that having "Dickie's" on their clothes might make them gay.
They should pray on it.
Interesting. So how do homosexuals like you feel about this “working class” trend in fashion?
This is a business decision, plain and simple.
A.) If you are sick and can't work, that's lost productivity and $$$.
B.) If you get get someone else sick, that's more lost productivity and $$$.
C.) Your unvaccinated workers needing hospital stays or medical treatment when they could have received a free vaccine and largely prevented costly healthcare expenditures isn't going to look great with the company's health insurer. This is result in higher premiums.
Long story short, companies don't care about their workers - =they care about productivity and money. Sick employees can't work.
This post was removed.
Vaxxedandmasked wrote:
I love my Carhartt clothes. I just had a work jacked of them on.
Yeah for them.
Are you trying to say you jacked off into your Carhatt jacket, or that you jacked off while wearing it?
Yes I started my boycott of carhartt. I just put in my first order from Duluth Trading.
I just took off my carhartt boots, and will happily put them on again. The fact of the matter is that while I'm anti mandate and am not vaccinated (not antivax, just don't want to get it), I do not give enough of a crap to buy new clothes over something that has no effect on me.
Being confirmed capitalists, they will respect the decision of the business. Biden isn't forcing them to do it.
totally radical dude wrote:
I'll Take This One... wrote:
They face a tough choice. Carhartt is fine quality stuff at a premium price. They could save money buying Dickie's but, most anti-vaxxers would be afraid that having "Dickie's" on their clothes might make them gay.
They should pray on it.
Interesting. So how do homosexuals like you feel about this “working class” trend in fashion?
It is fabulous, honey! Gives off those 70s retro Village People construction worker vibes. How do you feel about it? You good with the workin' man vibe? With a handle like totally radical dude, I'm guessing that you dig goth skater twink or closeted business daddy?
owning the libs?? wrote:
Carhatt, clothing maker for America’s underclasses, maintains their vaccination requirement despite no legal obligation. Will their vax-adverse (read: poor, stupid) clientele boycott? Can they afford to?
clothes for underclass?
excuse me?
carhatt is pretty expensive...known as the "snob" work wear brand. you obviously have no idea what you are talking about
I bet Carhartt has many worker requirements that are not legally mandated. Maybe they do not let employees wear a competitor's clothing while on the floor.
Let's keep in mind that Twitter is hardly representative of the US population. So a few people going wild on social media is not a reason to make a decision.
This did not go as you hoped it would, OP, but good try.
Submissive OP goes home devastated. Catches wife with the neighbor (who wears Carhartt).