Is Russia attacking Ukraine now?

Attacking sounds adversarial. Russia is obtaining Ukraine. Russia would rather obtain Ukraine with a handshake and a smile than a .38 to the ... .

pretty sh*tty situation for ukraine right now

EU aint going to do sh*t cause russia will use natural gas as leverage, and sleep brandon will just mumble on tv to putin and nothing will happen.

prediction is russia takes Ukraine and Kazakhstan before summer and nothing will happen. china takes Taiwan around the same time, egypt and ethiopia go to war over the nile, and california will have forest fires

Fat lazy entitled Americans tearing their hair out over foreigners' business

For their own amusement at that.

Utterly perverse. Get lives.

Ukraine is a fake country invented by the Kaiser's army in WW1 to serve as Imperial Germany's bread basket. Russia is just taking back what was already theirs.

Randy Andy The Second wrote:

Ukraine is a fake country invented by the Kaiser's army in WW1 to serve as Imperial Germany's bread basket. Russia is just taking back what was already theirs.

You are seriously delusional. Ukraine was a country before Moscow ever became a city. Fake country? Hilarious

attacking sounds so ... wrote:

Attacking sounds adversarial. Russia is obtaining Ukraine. Russia would rather obtain Ukraine with a handshake and a smile than a .38 to the ... .

It’s called INVADING an independent country. Russia has no right to invade any country.

Do you watch all videos with Ukranian girls?

sickcommies wrote:

attacking sounds so ... wrote:

Attacking sounds adversarial. Russia is obtaining Ukraine. Russia would rather obtain Ukraine with a handshake and a smile than a .38 to the ... .

It’s called INVADING an independent country. Russia has no right to invade any country.

What were you doing, 1989 to early 1990's poster? C.I.A. destabilized that part of the world. Ukraine was never supposed to be a separate country. If no C.I.A., Ukraine would be just another Soviet territory. Stay out of grown folk business. U.S. through C.I.A. never should have encouraged break up of Soviet Union. Once Soviet Union broke up, U.S. should never have encouraged Ukraine to be a N.A.T.O. applicant. As I type, C.I.A./D.o.D. have leaked to mainstream media that U.S. most likely will financially back Ukraine rebels against Russia. A waste of U.S. tax dollars.

Putin has troops on the border to intimidate Ukraine into not joining NATO.

He will also turn off the natural gas flow to Europe as another tactic.

The second Russian forces begin major offensives on Ukrainian soil it will be big news and you won't miss it.

Russia is trying to intimidate Ukraine but from what I gather aside from small arms fire along the border no major offensives are taking place.

If that happens it will be huge news.

sickcommies wrote:

attacking sounds so ... wrote:

Attacking sounds adversarial. Russia is obtaining Ukraine. Russia would rather obtain Ukraine with a handshake and a smile than a .38 to the ... .

It’s called INVADING an independent country. Russia has no right to invade any country.

Did Victoria Nuland and the rest of the necocons have the right to violently overthrow the elected Govt of Ukraine in 2014 and install their own puppet?

carmine9 wrote:

sickcommies wrote:

It’s called INVADING an independent country. Russia has no right to invade any country.

Did Victoria Nuland and the rest of the necocons have the right to violently overthrow the elected Govt of Ukraine in 2014 and install their own puppet?

Not a true statement. Certainly has nothing to do with the topic of Russian invasion

sickcommies wrote:

carmine9 wrote:

Did Victoria Nuland and the rest of the necocons have the right to violently overthrow the elected Govt of Ukraine in 2014 and install their own puppet?

Not a true statement. Certainly has nothing to do with the topic of Russian invasion

You honestly don't know this? Don't remember Nuland's comments on who to install to run Ukraine? The US overthrow (violently) of the elected Govt of Ukraine that was friendly to Russia is not pertinent?

Russian invasion is more CIA disinfo anyway

sickcommies wrote:

carmine9 wrote:

Did Victoria Nuland and the rest of the necocons have the right to violently overthrow the elected Govt of Ukraine in 2014 and install their own puppet?

Not a true statement. Certainly has nothing to do with the topic of Russian invasion

The Guardian: It's not Russia that pushed Ukraine to the brink of war. April 30th, 2014

America's Ukraine Hypocrisy, CATO Institute, August 5th, 2017

How and Why U.S. Government Perpetrated the 2014 Coup.

U.S. Civil War, rebellious southerners thought Great Britain would help southern cause. What if Great Britain helped South Carolina gain temporary independence? If you are saying Russia does not have a right to take back Ukraine is like saying U.S. Government had no right to fight rebellious southerners. Great Britain was the powerful nation in the world, 1860's. Great Britain had the wisdom to stay out of U.S. Civil War. U.S. never had a right to get involved in affairs of now former Soviet Union.

bannnnned i got wrote:

pretty sh*tty situation for ukraine right now

EU aint going to do sh*t cause russia will use natural gas as leverage, and sleep brandon will just mumble on tv to putin and nothing will happen.

prediction is russia takes Ukraine and Kazakhstan before summer and nothing will happen. china takes Taiwan around the same time, egypt and ethiopia go to war over the nile, and california will have forest fires

Russia was just in Kaz. Sooo, why did they leave after kicking a--?

Here's a thought for the gullible Demosheep... how about not believing people like Jake Sullivan and the imperialist west, and start to understand that it is the west/NATO encroaching on Russia? Sullivan was one of the propagandist of the BS 'Russian dossier'. If Hillary had won in 2016, war with Russia was inevitable. Now that Slow Joe is the puppet, here we are.

Got to love how the US commentators blame each other for something that is all down to Putin. You guys need to think beyond your own perverse democrat/republican narrative. It’s boring and naive.

Wondering what the obvious Russian false flag would be? I’m going with incursion into Russia by Ukrainian troops…

tool bags wrote:

Got to love how the US commentators blame each other for something that is all down to Putin. You guys need to think beyond your own perverse democrat/republican narrative. It’s boring and naive.

Wondering what the obvious Russian false flag would be? I’m going with incursion into Russia by Ukrainian troops…

Ukrainian forces advancing into Russia - that sounds like a bit of a stretch. The very slim reports that have been released point to some type of urban sabotage of Russian forces in eastern Ukraine.

The whole thing has a heavy air of inevitability at this point. All that's left is how to blame the Dems (sorry, i couldn't resist).

Greg wrote:

Putin has troops on the border to intimidate Ukraine into not joining NATO.

This right here. Russia will do whatever it takes to keep NATO out of Ukraine.

The one and only reason USA is involved in this is because they would LOVE to have a military base right next to Russia.

It really sad to watch how USA is feeding Ukraine false dreams of western world and is supplying them with weapons, when in reality Ukraine will never have western quality of life, since Ukrainians are.... well... not westerners.

Then why does Ukraine have a language distinct from Russian?

not a regular visitor anymore wrote:

Then why does Ukraine have a language distinct from Russian?

And English, no?