Artie Lange wrote:
Dude, think about how you'd feel about a flat-earther "asking questions" about the earth being round.
That's akin to what you are doing with this crap.
This is exactly right. And the truth is, how easy is it for any individual here to actually DEMONSTRATE that the earth is, in fact, round rather than flat? It would take more time than I'm willing to devote in order to satisfy the demands of someone who is "just asking questions." As another poster pointed out, it takes wayyy more effort to debunk junk science than it does to spread it.
Rojo, the reason people are criticizing you is that you're in the fortunate position of having a great education and access to a highly educated network of people. Surely you know lots of doctors, and perhaps even some biomedical researchers. Do you really think that they're all part of some broad conspiracy to suppress effective treatments in order to pad their bottom line?
Ultimately, for complicated ideas, you have two basic choices. You can seek out trustworthy experts, or you can master the material yourself - a process that may take years. The loss of public trust in expertise is one of the big trends of the past two decades, and it's a serious and complicated issue. But deciding "I no longer trust the experts, so instead I'm going to read a blog post by some guy who couldn't even get into medical school in the U.S." is not a good alternative. You want to do your own research? Great, go for it. But the universe doesn't guarantee that the answers are easy. If I want to understand astrophysics, I'm unlikely to be able to double-check the calculations and observations made by astrophysicists unless I spend literally years learning about it. It'll be much easier to read some blog posts by astrologers instead, but that doesn't mean they're right or useful.